According to entwistle, how does the allies model view the other four models?

Abstract
Today, the integration of Christianity and psychology is becoming more increasingly recognized. The integration begins with understanding the sinful state of the human condition as viewed from a biblical perspective. It continues with being faithful to Christian stewardship and not only embracing theology but also the psychology of human behavior (Entwistle, 2015). A more accurate and complete understanding of human nature and function is provided through the integration of Christianity and psychology. The Allies model confirms that Christian theology and psychology are both subject to God’s authority, and exemplifies the best integrative relationship between Christianity and psychology (Entwistle, 2015). This paper will discuss the integration of Christianity and psychology through the Allies model. It will define integration, review reasons and explanations of why Christianity and psychology should be integrated. As well as look at different methods of knowing, the Allies model concept, and the two books idea along with strengths and weaknesses of this model.

Introduction
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines integration as “to combine (two or more things) to form or create something …” (Merriam-Webster.com). Christianity and psychology can be joined to achieve a common purpose while remaining faithful to each discipline. When Christianity and psychology are combined, there are many things to be learned about the nature and functions of human beings

Entwistle, D. N. (2010). Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity: An introduction to worldview issues, philosophical foundations, and models of integration. (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: Cascade.

Abstract Within Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity, Entwistle inquires if psychology and theology can be unified. Entwistle suggest a sufficient technique of integration albeit the Allies model, and this paper will outline the strengths and restraints of this model as well as how Methods of Knowing and the Two Book Concept further discover the effectiveness of the model. The justification of this paper is to instruct its reader on different subjects of the Allies model concerning the integration of theology and psychology. In line with this, the advantages and drawbacks are shown as well as how this model deals with diverse concepts, and how it considers the relationship between Christianity and psychology. In every…show more content…
One of our first obstacles is defining exactly what assumptions are constitutive of a uniquely Christian approach to psychology. How do we identify the core convictions of Christianity, and how can we leave room for a divergence of different Christian approaches?” (Entwistle 2015). The main problem that Entwistle is addressing is integration and the boundaries in which they both inhabit together. Where do the bounds of psychology and theology begin and end? Defining the boundaries of where these sciences take authority is definitely a limitation. Regarding this, bias is another limitation that this model has to deal with. In regards to this, bias can be implemented when someone favors one of the two sciences over the other in a way that creates an unbalance. The Allies model does not serve either science, but rather, it serves God and God alone. In that, God has created both sciences and hold them in an equal stance. This can also be seen as a strength of the model. The Allies model has ability to attain knowledge from either source and thus has a more comprehensive foundation of knowledge. Another strength of the model is that it does not limit our investigation of either psychology or theology. We are allowed to explore the inner makings of each…show more content…
“The Allies model is premised on the belief that God’s truths are revealed in the book of God’s Word (Scripture) and the book of God’s Works (creation)” (Entwistle, 2015). As Christians, our main source of knowledge should be from God. At the same time it is also important to understand that God is the author of both nature and scripture. In accordance with this, John 1:3 says, “Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made” (Holy Bible, NIV). As stated, God has created all of nature and thus His truth should be able to be found through it. Because of this, Christians should also understand that knowledge gained from nature can be true even if it is not outlined in the Bible. As a sinful people discerning God’s truth from nature, it is necessary for there to be a lot of wisdom and self-reflection on the Christian’s part. In understanding psychology and theology, we as Christians must first understand intellectual humility. Entwistle said this about intellectual humility, “Humility as an intellectual virtue involves our recognition of our intellectual abilities and liabilities. It allows us to receive corrections, feedback, and affirmation appropriately and to develop and exercise our abilities unencumbered by arrogance or self-deprecation.” (Entwistle, 2015). According to Entwistle, the

What is a goal of the Allies model according to Entwistle?

The Allies model confirms that Christian theology and psychology are both subject to God's authority, and exemplifies the best integrative relationship between Christianity and psychology (Entwistle, 2015).

How does the Allies model view the two books?

According to the Allies model, the two books that best explain psychology from a Christian perspective are Gods Word and Gods Works. Many integrationists define these books as the book of scripture (God's Word) and the book of nature (God's Works) (Entwistle, 2015).

What was Entwistle's main point in sharing the story about Jimmy's claim to have learned guitar on stage with a rock and roll star quizlet?

What was Entwistle's main point in sharing the story about Jimmy's claim to have learned guitar on stage with a rock and roll star? . . Answer: The conclusion was contingent on each person's method of evaluating knowledge. The video in module 2 described how facts fit in a discussion of worldview.

How does Entwistle describe the focus of integration in regard to creating?

How does Entwistle describe the focus of integration in regard to creating, maintaining, adapting, or eliminating theoretical integration? The focus is on critiquing secular theories of integration.

zusammenhängende Posts

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte