How did Intel confront and address the issue of conflict minerals in its supply chain quizlet?

2015 | Case No. ETH-5 | Length 11 pgs.

The term “conflict minerals” referred to four minerals—tantalum, tin, tungsten, and gold—that are mined in countries throughout the world, including the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).  These minerals, sometimes referred to as the “3TG” minerals, were used in many industries for a variety of purposes.  The electronics industry was a significant user of the “3 T’s” and gold.  Tungsten, for instance, was used in the screens of cellphones and also created the vibrating alert.  Tantalum held the battery charge in a cellphone or tablet, was critical to the exchange of text messages and emails, and was a component of cellphone camera lenses.

The conflict minerals issue dated to the early 2000s but public awareness took years to develop, following the efforts of nongovernment organizations such as the Enough Project.  Intel began to work on the issue internally in 2008, at the direction of its CEO, and conducted its first conflict minerals supply chain survey in 2009. Intel then pledged to manufacture microprocessors with tantalum sourced from conflict-free supply chains by 2012 and to make the world’s first commercially available microprocessor that is DRC conflict free for all four metals by 2013; it achieved both goals. Intel’s decision to address the conflict minerals problem head-on was one of the movement’s first big successes; the policies Intel implemented to obtain conflict-free minerals went beyond what was required by Dodd-Frank.

Learning Objective

This case enables students to understand how Intel confronted and addressed the issue of conflict minerals in its supply chain. Intel’s decision to self-regulate when it came to conflict minerals preceded implementation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (which contains provisions related to conflict minerals) and exceeded its scope. Intel’s effort required the company to obtain a deep understanding of its supply chain for the minerals tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold and to implement a certification process for smelters from which it obtained these minerals. The support of Intel’s CEO was crucial to this effort, as was the company’s willingness to work with non-government organizations.

This material is available for download by current Stanford GSB students, faculty, and staff, as well as Stanford GSB alumni. For inquires, contact the Case Writing Office. Download

How did Intel eliminate conflict minerals from their supply chain?

How did Intel eliminate conflict minerals from their supply chain? By collaborating with most suppliers in the chain including smelters, processors, and traders. The term "race to the bottom" refers to: Moving production jobs to the country with the lowest labor cost.

Why was Intel unable to eliminate conflict minerals from its supply chain unilaterally that is without the help of others?

Intel wasn't able to eliminate conflict materials from its supply chain unilaterally due to the complex, multistep global supply chain. There are many traders shipments that occur before the mineral is mined in its raw state to when it reaches Intel and can be used in the final product.

Why is Intel conflict free minerals important?

Conflict minerals have been linked with funding killings, violence, rape, and other human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of Congo and other conflict-affected and high-risk areas (CAHRAs).

What are the 4 conflict minerals?

In politically unstable areas, armed groups often use forced labour to mine minerals. They then sell those minerals to fund their activities, for example to buy weapons. These so-called 'conflict minerals', such as tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, can find their way into our mobile phones, cars and jewellery.

Toplist

Neuester Beitrag

Stichworte