Die tribute von panem mockingjay teil 1 im tv

Weiter mit Tracking durch Dritte

Besuchen Sie unsere Website mit personalisierter Werbung und Werbetracking durch Dritte. Details und Informationen zu Cookies, Verarbeitungszwecken sowie Ihrer jederzeitigen Widerrufsmöglichkeit finden Sie in der Datenschutzerklärung und in den Privatsphäre-Einstellungen.

Nutzen Sie unser Angebot ohne Werbetracking durch Dritte für 4,99 Euro/Monat. Kunden mit einem bestehenden Abo (Tageszeitung, e-Paper oder PLUS) zahlen nur 0,99 Euro/Monat. Informationen zur Datenverarbeitung im Rahmen des PUR-Abos finden Sie in der Datenschutzerklärung.

Sendung

Die Sendung namens Die Tribute von Panem – Mockingjay läuft auf dem Fernsehsender Sat.1, Pro7, ORF1, SRF zwei, Kabel 1 Classics und ORF 1 und dauert 120 Minuten. Letzter Sendetermin war Samstag, den 04. September 2021 um 22:40 Uhr auf ProSieben. Die Sendung wurde bislang drei Mal ausgestrahlt. Es handelt sich um einen Film.

Termine

Alle Sendetermine diesen Monats sehen Sie im Kalendar bunt hervorgehoben. Vor 442 Tagen war die letzte Ausstrahlung und aktuell sind keine zusätzlichen Ausstrahlungen vorgesehen, nimm Streaming.

• Sonntag, 18.08. 01:10 auf ORF 1

• Sonntag, 18.08. 15:45 auf ProSieben

• Freitag, 23.08. 20:15 auf ProSieben

• Freitag, 03.09. 20:15 auf ProSieben

• Samstag, 04.09. 22:40 auf ProSieben

Stream Die Tribute von Panem- Mockingjay Teil 1 (ganzer Film; Deutsch)

Sendungen mit gleichem Wortanfang:

Die dargestellten Informationen stammen aus offen zugänglichen Quellen. Diese haben keine Rechtswirkung. Aktualität, Vollständigkeit und Richtigkeit unverbindlich. Alle Handelsmarken, Warenzeichen oder eingetragenen Marken auf dieser Internetseite sind im Besitz der jeweiligen Inhaber.

HomeKinoKino NewsKino Nachrichten: Videos

"Die Tribute von Panem 3 - Mockingjay Teil 1": In neuem TV-Spot fordert Peeta die Rebellen auf, ihre Waffen niederzulegen

Von Alrik Seidel — 31.10.2014 um 13:55

Teile diesen Artikel

Das könnte dich auch interessieren

By now I am unlikely to convince anyone who hasn’t already watched the Hunger Games films to watch this one, or for those who are fans, to tell you much new. In that case the most useful thing I could do would be describe the value of any special features on the Blu-Ray set, which I’ll do, but first I can’t help but say some things about this film and the whole series thus far (3 out of 4 total films).

No, I didn’t read the books and don’t plan to. I no longer have time to read fiction books if I can watch a film version (generally speaking). Yes I understand, the book is always “better”.

The book series had as its target audience teens (especially I presume teenage girls since the lead character is female) but the films have Caught Fire (the subtitle of Mockingjay part 1 is Catching Fire) among adults just as much as teens. This is due to several elements: a strong story, a wonderfully talented group of actors, a fine director, great photography, special effects and design teams, and an ample budget for producing smashingly good looking films.

If, like me, you saw any of the films but didn’t read the books you might have basic questions like, “Where exactly IS Panem?” [The country in which the action takes place]. And, When is Panem? And how did the world get from here to there?

The answers to many of these questions [ie, to making the series believable as some possible future time in our own world, rather than as a purely fictional backdrop like the Star Wars “somewhere in a galaxy far away and a long time ago”, are not in the films and basically do not matter much. Those who don’t already understand should bear in mind: every story about the future (and yes, this would fall in the realm of science fiction set in the future of our world) is actually a story about the PRESENT, and often also a story about the PAST, as is the case here.

As I had suspected, “Panem” is essentially North America—far enough into the future that nobody even refers to terms like “United States”, or individual states or provinces, nor do they refer to any other countries on earth either [which led to some initial doubt in my mind whether Panem was actually the whole world, but no—it appears for the purpose of this story there is no obvious contact with other areas of the world. Either there are extensively depopulated areas isolating humanity into separate regions, or perhaps the rest of the world is uninhabited, or inhabited by more primitive societies...

Another curious aspect of this future world is the mixture of high technology (in many areas, further advanced than we are today—most obvious in biotechnology as there are new, apparently man-made species, new treatments for physical ailments etc, but also higher tech in some “hardware”—I was saying, a weird mixture of advanced technology and often very primitive living conditions. Then I thought back to the real world again—for example to areas of the USSR back in the 1950’s and 1960’s, when they launched the world’s first satellite and were fully our rivals in nuclear weaponry, yet average people might wait for hours in line to enter grocery stores devoid of most anything except bread and milk and a few eggs…or Communist China today, which has become the world’s largest factory and yet millions of people still have very modest living conditions...

Back to the film: after a war, or several wars, Panem now consists of the Capital (located somewhere in the Rocky Mountains—probably the Colorado area), and 12 other “districts”. Social organization is rather like so many countries around the world even today: there is an elite in the capital, living in indolent and vacuous luxury, there is an army/police force to keep the people in the districts in line, there is a “President” who is actually a dictator, chosen in as byzantine a fashion as the old Roman emperors or the modern Chinese Premiers. The people in the provinces lead lives of grinding poverty and subsistence conditions, while most of the fruit of their labor goes to the Capital.

And of course there’s this annual “games” thing which provides a major backbone to the plot especially in the first two films, in which one boy and one girl are chosen from each district, brought to the Capital, feted, given training for a few weeks, then thrown into an outdoor arena where they must fight each other to the death and everybody gets to watch it on TV. And Jennifer Lawrence, due at least in part to years of practice supplementing the family diet with bow & arrow, has the bad luck to be thrown into an annual game, but the good fortune to win it. From there, the story gradually moves to her unexpectedly becoming the focus for the anger of people in all districts about the inequalities of distribution, not just of wealth but of the basic items like food, and the lack of freedom in general. Obviously in the final two films the story is no longer about the annual games at all, but about the districts breaking out into open rebellion and the Capital doing all in its power to crush any dissent before it has a chance to blossom (another oblique reference to this film).

If Scarlett Johansson and Jennifer Lawrence are essentially the Marilyn Monroes for Generation X and the Millenials, which they are, it’s interesting to reflect on their differences both from each other and from past female stars. Johansson is now 31 and Lawrence only 25, so they both may have many decades of great movies to come, if they take good care of themselves.

Of the two, Lawrence seems much more serious and brooding. Yes she can look stunning in an expensive dress at an awards ceremony, but she really looks much more at home wearing baggy outdoors gear. Her character also, despite the attempt at depicting conflicted romance in the Hunger Games, seem more preoccupied with other issues than “romantic love”. Having been born in Kentucky to a construction working father and a mother who ran a day camp, and having two older brothers to contend with certainly fits in with the “tom-boy” aspects to her personality. And this works so very well in the Hunger Games series. I mentioned the attempt at “conflicted romance” in these films. Ostensibly by film three, this one, we’re meant to see her feeling torn between an attraction to two guys, both of whom she’s known since childhood. But what I see her projecting instead is a young woman so horrified by what she’s seen done to her family, to her town, to her whole district, and then to top it off having to survive not one but two “Games”, that she’s just too overwhelmed and too busy surviving to put much energy into “falling in love”. By the end of this film, that still seems more like a luxury to be put off, if possible, to a more stable hoped-for day in the future….

This film like the first two, has a stellar supporting cast, including Donald Sutherland in what must be one of the best roles of his life as President Snow, a character he totally loathes, but plays to absolute perfection. Elizabeth Banks as “Effie”, a creature of the capital whose job includes once a year going to those dreadfully dreary and dirty districts to select Games contestants, and (much more fun) doing their makeup for TV and live appearances when they are in the Capital. Effie is completely, over-the-top, outrageously about FASHION (as is all of the Capital) and Banks throws herself into this visually stunning character with her usual 150% enthusiasm. In sharp contrast with her is another scene-stealer, Woody Harrelson as Hamitsch Abernathy, veteran of a game years ago whose job it is now to give general advice and help line up sponsors for one lucky district team each year (and he undoubtedly has his counterparts for the teams of every district, but these characters came from #12). Hamitsch’s character likely has longstanding PTSD from the process of becoming the sole survivor of his contest, which he covers up liberally with alcohol. He & Effie constantly goad each other, apparently a sign that they’re both attracted to each other but are from such radically different backgrounds that they don’t know what else to do with the attraction except continue that early-adolescent sniping well into adulthood…and so many other great actors, Stanley Tucci, and who can forget Philip Seymour Hoffman, whose final 2 films were Mockingjay 1 & 2. I get the impression he died before they had quite finished shooting the second film, probably necessitating some juggling of the scenes.

The director chose to shoot this digitally for reasons beyond my expertise, prominent among which I believe is the ease of going back and adding in CG imagery, but he dislikes the ultra-sharp look of digital filming and softened it in this film, in part by the subtle use of smoke in the air, and in part by the set lighting. The computer generated imagery is extremely well-integrated, and looks simply superb, and one cannot tell where the real background leaves off and CGI steps in. In any case whenever there’s a choice, this director prefers “the real thing”, which led to interesting situations like building a 6-ton set, putting Miss Lawrence and several other key characters inside it, then hoisting the whole thing by crane & cable until it dangled 60 feet above ground—something which I think gave the lawyers, insurance agents, and safety managers several nights of severe insomnia.

This film was done partly in the Atlanta area and in other parts outside Paris and outside Berlin (simply to find the most ideal locations useable for filming).

Blu-Ray specials: Well, the basic movie was almost exactly 2 hours…a tad long but not overly-long. Among the extras were around 8 deleted scenes, and had they all been added it would have been more like 2.5 hours---not un-doable, but they all seem to have been trimmed primarily for the running time. Virtually all of them are good scenes, so their presence is a plus for the Blu Ray.
Of course there is the “director commentary” soundtrack…not sure who listens to that except the people that spoke, and people who fantasize about directing their own film, but there it is, anyhow. Then there’s a decent series of (mercifully) short films detailing various aspects of “the making of”. This included a special tribute to Philip Seymour Hoffman, as well as: cast, settings, cinematography, makeup and prosthetics, wardrobe, blah blah blah. What did I learn from this? First, there is in fact a new generation of these specialists busy growing up, just like Lawrence and Johansson. Second, this film is not in the same category of “extreme uber-detail” as a Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings or Hobbit movie, but it surpasses almost every other movie in terms of detailed costuming, prostheses, make-up and the like. It is perhaps comparable to the attention given in the specials to the Star Wars films where they had to create unique looks for people and cultures from multiple worlds. Still nobody, absolutely nobody surpasses Jackson and Weta Works when it comes to visual props…

This film is absolutely worth watching. I expect the full series of 4 films should rate the A list in cinema history. I never saw so many scene-stealers all together before in my life…what a treat.

Wann kommt mockingjay 1 im Fernsehen?

Wann läuft mockingjay 2022?

Wo läuft mockingjay?

Wann kommt die Tribute von Panem im Fernsehen 2022?