journal article Show
Review of International Political Economy Vol. 1, No. 1 (Spring, 1994) , pp. 53-80 (28 pages) Published By: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4177090 Read and download Log in through your school or library Purchase article $51.00 - Download now and later Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $51.00 USD. How does it work?
Abstract Even when political rule is territorial, territoriality does not necessarily entail the practices of total mutual exclusion which dominant understandings of the modern territorial state attribute to it. However, when the territoriality of the state is debated by international relations theorists the discussion is overwhelmingly in terms of the persistence or obsolescence of the territorial state as an unchanging entity rather than in terms of its significance and meaning in different historical-geographical circumstances. Contemporary events call this approach into question. The end of the Cold War, the increased velocity and volatility of the world economy, and the emergence of political movements outside the framework of territorial states, suggest the need to consider the territoriality of states in historical context. Conventional thinking relies on three geographical assumptions-states as fixed units of sovereign space, the domestic/foreign polarity, and states as 'containers' of societies - that have led into the 'territorial trap'. Journal Information The Review of International Political Economy (RIPE) has successfully established itself as a leading international journal dedicated to the systematic exploration of the international political economy from a plurality of perspectives. The journal encourages a global and interdisciplinary approach across issues and fields of inquiry. It seeks to act as a point of convergence for political economists, international relations scholars, geographers, and sociologists, and is committed to the publication of work that explores such issues as international trade and finance, production and consumption, and global governance and regulation, in conjunction with issues of culture, identity, gender, and ecology. The journal eschews monolithic perspectives and seeks innovative work that is both pluralist in its orientation and engages with the broad literatures of IPE. Publisher Information Building on two centuries' experience, Taylor & Francis has grown rapidlyover the last two decades to become a leading international academic publisher.The Group publishes over 800 journals and over 1,800 new books each year, coveringa wide variety of subject areas and incorporating the journal imprints of Routledge,Carfax, Spon Press, Psychology Press, Martin Dunitz, and Taylor & Francis.Taylor & Francis is fully committed to the publication and dissemination of scholarly information of the highest quality, and today this remains the primary goal. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. Which of the following most likely explains why the Qing government employed the scholars?In the context of the period 1450-1750, which of the following most likely explains why the Qing government employed the scholars shown in the image? States sought to centralize their rule by including foreigners whose positions were dependent on the state to serve in the bureaucracy.
Which of the following was a principal cause of the Cold War?Historians have identified several causes that led to the outbreak of the Cold War, including: tensions between the two nations at the end of World War II, the ideological conflict between both the United States and the Soviet Union, the emergence of nuclear weapons, and the fear of communism in the United States.
Which of the following best explains why the movement described in the passage began after the Second World War?Which of the following best explains why the movement described in the passage began after the Second World War? The defeat of the Axis powers required the Allies to grant political concessions in order mobilize colonial populations militarily and economically.
Which of the following is the most serious limitation of the table as a source of information on the comparative military capabilities of nuclear powers?Which of the following is the most serious limitation of the table as a source of information on the comparative military capabilities of nuclear powers? It does not include data on the total destructive power of the nuclear stockpiles of each nation.
|
All of the following contributed to the end of the political order depicted on the map EXCEPT
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 paraquee Inc.
