How did great britain and france place the new united states in the middle of their conflict?

This treaty, signed on September 3, 1783, between the American colonies and Great Britain, ended the American Revolution and formally recognized the United States as an independent nation.

The American War for Independence (1775-1783) was actually a world conflict, involving not only the United States and Great Britain, but also France, Spain, and the Netherlands. The peace process brought a nascent United States into the arena of international diplomacy, playing against the largest and most established powers on earth.

The three American negotiators – John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and John Jay – proved themselves ready for the world stage, achieving many of the objectives sought by the new United States. Two crucial provisions of the treaty were British recognition of U.S. independence and the delineation of boundaries that would allow for American western expansion.

The treaty is named for the city in which it was negotiated and signed. The last page bears the signatures of David Hartley, who represented Great Britain, and the three American negotiators, who signed their names in alphabetical order.

Multiple treaty documents, however, can be considered as originals. In this case, the United States and British representatives signed at least three originals, two of which are in the holdings of the National Archives. On one of the signed originals the signatures and wax seals are arranged horizontally; on the other they are arranged vertically. In addition, handwritten certified copies were made for the use of Congress. Some online transcriptions of the treaty omit Delaware from the list of former colonies, but the original text does list Delaware.

If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website.

If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked.

When the British government attempted to consolidate its vast North American holdings after the French withdrawal in 1763, it found itself confronted by what turned out to be insoluble problems about how to control and pay for its new empire. The government immediately established a Proclamation Line along the ridge of the Appalachian Mountains, beyond which white settlement was to be prohibited. A decade later it placed what would later become the Northwest Territory under the governance of the French-speaking province of Quebec, in defiance of the preferences of English settlers moving toward and into that area. English and particularly Scottish fur-trading companies moved in aggressively to replace the French control of that trade and reap its benefits. Such imperial politics had little appeal or relevance to many American colonists. In terms of its numbers, British America was overwhelmingly a settlers' frontier, moving west and overland from the Atlantic coast. In 1760 there had been only 80,000 inhabitants in all of French North America. By contrast, a decade later, there were 1,500,000 inhabitants in the British colonies, and the growth in numbers was explosive. Migration to the west was a habit, and, for many Americans (as they were coming to be called), it had become a right.

How did great britain and france place the new united states in the middle of their conflict?
"Fort Mackinac in 1905: Photograph from pasture southwest of the fort, between the village and the Grand Hotel." Collections of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin, Volume 18 (1908).

The Upper Midwest was beyond the reach of most of the Revolutionary War, but the treaty of peace in 1783 practically created it as an American province. The boundary established at that treaty made that region, and almost everything east of the Mississippi, nominally part of the United States. In fact, despite the treaty, the British remained in control of the area for another decade, and the situation remained unstable until a new war had been fought and a new treaty concluded in 1814.

The British lost political control through such wars and treaties, but English cultural influence in the new nation was pervasive. English speech and a host of English institutions were taken for granted in the new nation and in what became the Northwest Territory.

When the French and Indian War finally ended in 1763, no British subject on either side of the Atlantic could have foreseen the coming conflicts between the parent country and its North American colonies. Even so, the seeds of these conflicts were planted during, and as a result of, this war. Keep in mind that the French and Indian War (known in Europe as the Seven Years' War) was a global conflict. Even though Great Britian defeated France and its allies, the victory came at great cost. In January 1763, Great Britain's national debt was more than 122 million pounds [the British monetary unit], an enormous sum for the time. Interest on the debt was more than 4.4 million pounds a year. Figuring out how to pay the interest alone absorbed the attention of the King and his ministers.

How did great britain and france place the new united states in the middle of their conflict?
Cantonment of the forces in North America, 11 October 1765
The American Revolution and Its Era, 1750-1789

Nor was the problem of the imperial debt the only one facing British leaders in the wake of the Seven Years' War. Maintaining order in America was a significant challenge. Even with Britain's acquisition of Canada from France, the prospects of peaceful relations with the Native America tribes were not good. As a result, the British decided to keep a standing army in America. This decision would lead to a variety of problems with the colonists. In addition, an uprising on the Ohio frontier - Pontiac's Rebellion - led to the Proclamation of 1763, which forbade colonial settlement west of the Allegany Mountains. This, too, would lead to conflicts with land-hungry settlers and land speculators like George Washington (see map above).

British leaders also felt the need to tighten control over their empire. To be sure, laws regulating imperial trade and navigation had been on the books for generations, but American colonists were notorious for evading these regulations. They were even known to have traded with the French during the recently ended war. From the British point of view, it was only right that American colonists should pay their fair share of the costs for their own defense. If additional revenue could also be realized through stricter control of navigation and trade, so much the better. Thus the British began their attempts to reform the imperial system.

In 1764, Parliament enacted the Sugar Act, an attempt to raise revenue in the colonies through a tax on molasses. Although this tax had been on the books since the 1730s, smuggling and laxity of enforcement had blunted its sting. Now, however, the tax was to be enforced. An outcry arose from those affected, and colonists implemented several effective protest measures that centered around boycotting British goods. Then in 1765, Parliament enacted the Stamp Act, which placed taxes on paper, playing cards, and every legal document created in the colonies. Since this tax affected virtually everyone and extended British taxes to domestically produced and consumed goods, the reaction in the colonies was pervasive. The Stamp Act crisis was the first of many that would occur over the next decade and a half.

For additional documents related to these topics, search Loc.gov using such key words as Stamp Act, Indians, western lands, colonial trade, navigation, and the terms found in the documents. Another strategy is to browse relevant collections by date.

Documents

  • George Washington to Robert Stewart, August 13, 1763
  • George Washington to William Crawford, September 21, 1767
  • George Washington to Francis Dandridge, September 20, 1765
  • George Washington to Robert Cary & Company, September 20, 1765
  • No Stamped Paper to Be Had, 1765
  • A Letter to His Most Excellent Majesty, 1765
  • Glorious News, May 19, 1766
  • Virginia House of Burgesses, November 14, 1766

Part of

  • Primary Source Sets
  • Lesson Plans
  • Presentations

Additional Navigation

  • Teachers Home

    The Library of Congress offers classroom materials and professional development to help teachers effectively use primary sources from the Library's vast digital collections in their teaching.

  • Analysis Tool & Guide

    To help your students analyze these primary sources, get a graphic organizer and guides.

How did Great Britain and France place the newly formed United States in the middle of their problems in the late?

It could be argued that Great Britain and France placed the newly formed United States in the middle of their problems in the late 1700s by arguing over remaining territory, in the sense that the British blatantly ignored many aspects of the Treaty of Paris in terms of boundaries after the American Revolution ended.

What were the major reasons for conflict between the British and the French?

The main reason behind the Anglo-French War was the dispute over colonial possessions in North America. This rivalry was further fueled by the prospect of trade in India as well.

What impact did the French and Indian War have on the relationship between the British Crown and its North American colonies?

The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war's expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American revolution.

Why was the tension between the United States and Britain growing?

Britain's debt from the French and Indian War led it to try to consolidate control over its colonies and raise revenue through direct taxation (e.g., Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, Tea Act, and Intolerable Acts), generating tensions between Great Britain and its North American colonies.