 Show
yes, Fayol's principle: unity of command is contradictory to Taylor ' technique:functional. foremanship as Fayol insisted that there should be one and only one boss for every individual. employee. whereas in functional foremanship Taylor suggested four foreman for planning and four foremen for execution.
First of all... Functional foremenship is a technique and yes both r
contradictory.
Dear Student, According to the principle of Unity of Command, any person should be answerable to just one boss. If an individual receives command from two or more people then, this principle is violated. However, under functional foremanship, the workers at the lower level management are assigned to take orders from eight foremen. That is, each worker has to follow the commands given by any of the eight foremen (which is in violation to the principle of unity of command). Home Which principle does functional foremanship violate? Question A Division of Work No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today! B Unity of Command Right on! Give the BNAT exam to get a 100% scholarship for BYJUS courses C Unity of Direction No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today! D Authority and Responsibility No worries! We‘ve got your back. Try BYJU‘S free classes today! Open in App Solution The correct option is BUnity of Command Functional foremanship violates 'Unity of Command' principle.Suggest Corrections 0 Similar questions Q. Why does the principle of unity of command not hold good in an organisation using technique of functional foremanship? Q. What is the basic difference between unity of command and functional foremanship? View More The principle of unity of command states that an employee should receive orders from and be answerable only to one superior. On the other hand, under functional foremanship an employee receives order from many superiors at a time and he/she is answerable to all of them. Hence, we find that there is a contradiction between the two. This contradiction is because of the difference in their respective objective. The objective of the principle of unity of command is to avoid confusion regarding the work to be done and that of functional foremanship is to make possible the full utilisation of expertise of various experts. What contradiction do you find in the principle of unity of command and the technique of?Expert-verified answer
The contradiction in the principle of unity of command and the technique of functional foremanship is in the way a subordinate reports to his superior or boss.
Why do the principles of unity of command not hold good in an Organisation using technique of functional Foremanship?Principle of untiy of command not hold good in the case of functional foremanship because according to the principle of Unity of Command, any person should be answerable to just one boss. If an individual receives command from two or more people then, this principle is violated.
What violates the principle of unity of command?According to Fayol, there should be one and only one boss for every individual employee. If an employee gets orders from two superiors at the same time the principle of unity of command is violated.
Which principle does functional Foremanship violate?Whereas, in functional foremanship there are at least eight bosses under sub departments which are assigned to a single employee. This technique clearly violates the principle of unity of command as it is in contrast with what the principle says.
|
What contradiction do you find in the principle of unity of command and the techniques of functional Foremanship and why?
Urheberrechte © © 2024 paraquee Inc.
