What is the difference between Kirznerian entrepreneurship and Schumpeterian entrepreneurship

Discovering Kirzner, Week 1

We had a pretty good discussion today, especially on the distinction between the Schumpeterian and Kirznerian entrepreneurs (perhaps too much on Christiansen).  Ladies and gentlemen, the Kirznerian entrepreneur (emphasis his):

For me the function of the entrepreneur consists not of shifting the curves of cost or of revenues which face him, but of noticing that they have in fact shifted — Kirzner, Competition & Entrepreneurship, p. 81.

For further explication of the differences between Schumpeter and Kirzner (beyond what’s on pp. 79-81), see this piece by Don Boudreaux.

391 DS – Discovering Kirzner

Today we concluded this term’s Schumpeter Roundtable, what I consider a reasonably successful, certainly enjoyable reading of Joseph Schumpeter’s Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy.  Those who follow our blog have probably pegged its authors (notably me) as Schumpophiles, so to speak, but I think it was just a groove that we settled into following our reading of the Thomas McCraw biography, Prophet of Innovation: Joseph Schumpeter and Creative Destruction.

For the Spring term, we will take a crack at another noted entrepreneurship scholar, Israel Kirzner, whose Competition and Entrepreneurship is considered a classic in Austrian Economics.  This is a one-unit course that will meet weekly for about half of the term.  The requirements are to read, participate in discussions, and complete a short writing assignment.

Yes, but what is it all about?

According to the book’s publisher, Kirzner “provides at once a thorough critique of contemporary price theory, an essay on the theory of entrepreneurship, and an essay on the theory of competition. Competition and Entrepreneurship offers a new appraisal of quality competition, of selling effort, and of the fundamental weaknesses of contemporary welfare economics.”  And, writing for the Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, Russell Sobel gets at why this is important:

Two notable twentieth-century economists, Joseph Schumpeter and Israel Kirzner, further refined the academic understanding of entrepreneurship. Schumpeter stressed the role of the entrepreneur as an innovator who implements change in an economy by introducing new goods or new methods of production. In the Schumpeterian view, the entrepreneur is a disruptive force in an economy. Schumpeter emphasized the beneficial process of creative destruction, in which the introduction of new products results in the obsolescence or failure of others. The introduction of the compact disc and the corresponding disappearance of the vinyl record is just one of many examples of creative destruction: cars, electricity, aircraft, and personal computers are others.

In contrast to Schumpeter’s view, Kirzner focused on entrepreneurship as a process of discovery. Kirzner’s entrepreneur is a person who discovers previously unnoticed profit opportunities. The entrepreneur’s discovery initiates a process in which these newly discovered profit opportunities are then acted on in the marketplace until market competition eliminates the profit opportunity. Unlike Schumpeter’s disruptive force, Kirzner’s entrepreneur is an equilibrating force. An example of such an entrepreneur would be someone in a college town who discovers that a recent increase in college enrollment has created a profit opportunity in renovating houses and turning them into rental apartments. Economists in the modern Austrian school of economics have further refined and developed the ideas of Schumpeter and Kirzner.

That’s a good start, and I look forward to developing some auxiliary materials to help us to understand the material. It would probably help a lot of if you’ve had Econ 300, but I certainly won’t exclude anyone on that basis.  The course requirements are to read the book, attend several weekly discussions (likely five or six weeks), and complete one or two short writing assignments.

The sign up is 391 DS-Discovering Kirzner, as a one-unit course with either myself (Professor Gerard) or Professor Galambos.   We will arrange a time based on the schedules of those who sign up.

  • What is the difference between Kirznerian entrepreneurship and Schumpeterian entrepreneurship
    Access through your institution

What is the difference between Kirznerian entrepreneurship and Schumpeterian entrepreneurship

What is the difference between Kirznerian entrepreneurship and Schumpeterian entrepreneurship

Highlights

Contextual factors for supporting entrepreneurship in Turkey are evolving rapidly

Innovation is important in explaining expected growth for entrepreneurs

Fear of failure is an important individual level variable for entrepreneurship

Abstract

Emerging economies in the global economic arena are gaining growing importance. As the innovative capabilities in some of these economies are expanding, it is important to define and measure the complex nexus of entrepreneurship and innovation within the context of emerging economies.

This paper is emphasizing on the macro level of analysis and organizational approach with regard to innovative capabilities of new businesses in a given contextual environment. The paper investigates how the innovative approaches of an entrepreneur influence his/her growth expectation within the contextual framework of an emerging economy, namely Turkey. By classifying entrepreneurial activity as Schumpeterian type of entrepreneurship (innovation based) and Kirznerian type of entrepreneurship (opportunity based) we aim to investigate if the motive for entrepreneurship has an influence of growth expectations. To embrace micro level analysis as well, individual characteristics of the entrepreneur, namely fear of failure, is also included.

The data collected through the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) research program questionnaire was used in the analyses. In order to test the hypotheses developed, mixed model analyses was used. The results presented in this paper may be useful in understanding entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurship ecosystem in Turkey.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship

Innovation

Motive for operation

Growth expectation

Cited by (0)

Dr.-Eng. M. Atilla Öner is an Associate Professor in the Department of Business Administration at Yeditepe University. His research interests are foresight methodology, technology road mapping, R&D management and technology management. He supervises MS/MBA and PhD theses on national innovation systems, pilot national (sectoral) foresight studies and system dynamic modeling of R&D management, project management and public policy issues. He is on the editorial board of Foresight, Futures, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management and Science, Technology and Development.

Dr. Özlem Kunday is an assistant professor in the Department of Business Administration at Yeditepe University in Istanbul, Turkey. Her research areas are entrepreneurship, SME management and human resource management.

View full text

Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

What are the difference between the meaning of entrepreneurship as defined by Schumpeter and Kuratko?

According to Schumpeter, entrepreneurship is a new combination of strong organization that includes new services, new materials, and new methods of production. On the other hand, Kuratko defined it as a dynamic process, that one person should have vision, passion and applies energy for new creation.

What is Schumpeterian entrepreneurship?

Schumpeter's entrepreneur is an agent of change that is the source of his famous creative destruction. He introduces a new good or a new method of production, opens a new market or discovers a new source of supply, or carries out a new organization of an industry. He upsets the conventional way of doing things.

What is entrepreneurship according to Kirzner?

Kirzner's entrepreneur is a person who discovers previously unnoticed profit opportunities. The entrepreneur's discovery initiates a process in which these newly discovered profit opportunities are then acted on in the marketplace until market competition eliminates the profit opportunity.

What is Schumpeterian approach?

According to Schumpeter (1911), entrepreneurship more generally encompasses the introduction of new products to the market, firm entry into new or existing markets, and organizational improvements that enable firms to enhance the quality of their products, lower their prices, or achieve more efficient modes of ...