What is the difference between the rule-based detection when compared to behavioral detection? Answer: D Get Cisco CyberOps Associate CBROPS 200-201 now with the O’Reilly learning platform. O’Reilly members experience live online training, plus books, videos, and digital content from nearly 200 publishers. Start your free trial About | Helping organizations rise above the noise of the hybrid enterprise so they can better understand, secure, and grow their business in the cloud. Sophisticated cybersecurity attackers require a sophisticated network approach to protect the organization.
Most organizations have several security tools to defend the perimeter of the network, but the reality is that these vital perimeter defenses are frequently breached. Once attackers successfully bypass perimeter defenses, they can be difficult to detect, especially when the adversary has stolen credentials and is using legitimate services to move laterally and achieve their objectives. Network detection and response (NDR) provides a covert defense against these advanced threats. NDR cannot be evaded or tampered with, making it a crucial part of any security practice that hopes to catch stealthy threats, supply chain attacks, and advanced persistent threats that use legitimate credentials and systems to achieve malicious goals. Read the white paper on Network Detection & Response: How Reveal(x) Detects Threats. The network is an ideal point for detecting post-compromise attack activities for several reasons:
Reveal(x) provides both enhanced perimeter detections—which is more accurate than traditional intrusion detection—as well as a vital additional layer of defense in the case of an intrusion. This includes detecting subtle post-compromise activity such as misuse of Windows remote procedure calls and abnormal behavior from low-privileged devices or users. This behavior-based detection approach is able to effectively detect attacks with a much lower false-positive rate than legacy, signature-based intrusion detection systems, which are known for being too noisy to provide much value, but which are still hanging on in many enterprise environments. Reveal(x) detects anything an IDS can detect, and much more, with greater context and confidence. It provides coverage for many attacker tactics, techniques, and procedures across every category of the MITRE ATT&CK Framework, which is directly integrated into the product, as illustrated below. The MITRE ATT&CK Framework is integrated into the Reveal(x) NDR interface. Spectrum of Detections Reveal(x) employs numerous methods, including rule-based detection, machine-learning behavioral analysis, peer group analysis, and deep learning to detect the full spectrum of attack activity. Instead of relying on a single method, this combination of techniques provides more holistic coverage of attacker tactics, techniques, and procedures.
For more information about how Reveal(x) cloud-scale machine learning works, read our blog posts: Tricks of the Trade: How Reveal(x) Uses Machine Learning and ExtraHop Cloud Scale ML: A Deep Dive Rule-Based Detections and Decryption For rule-based detections, Reveal(x) does not use legacy techniques such as MD5 hash matching. Rather, our rules use sophisticated logic developed by our threat research team, fueled by the deep visibility Reveal(x) provides into the network. Using layers of signals derived from full-stream reassembly of network conversations and L2-L7 transaction details, Reveal(x) provides higher fidelity detections with much lower false positive rates than legacy IDS solutions. Furthermore, Reveal(x) decrypts traffic at line rate, out of band, for analysis. This includes TLS 1.3 traffic with perfect forward secrecy. This decryption is done securely and out-of-band so that it has no chance of degrading the quality of encryption or impacting the performance of the network. This capability unlocks transaction-level details and insights that provide a much greater degree of confidence, as well as detailed forensic evidence to help analysts rapidly investigate and respond to incidents. These details are opaque to solutions that cannot decrypt TLS 1.3, which leaves them guessing about what happened and unable to provide deep forensic details for investigation. Reveal(x) provides full records of transaction-level details, with the capacity for 90 days of lookback, as well as full, continuous packet capture (whether a detection fires or not), all accessible with a click so that analysts can rapidly and confidently respond to threats. Here's what a Reveal(x) detection looks like, annotated with a brief explanation of each piece of contextual data that is instantly available for analysts. For an even deeper look at Reveal(x) detection capabilities, please download our white paper: Network Detection & Response: How Reveal(x) Detects Threats Copyright © 2021 IDG Communications, Inc. What is behavior based detection?Behavior based detection is part of Kaspersky Lab's multi-layered, next generation approach to protection. It's one of the most efficient ways to protect against advanced threats like fileless malware, ransomware and zero-day malware.
What is a difference between signatureWhat is a difference between signature-based and behavior-based detection? A. Signature-based identifies behaviors that may be linked to attacks, while behavior-based has a predefined set of rules to match before an alert.
What is rule based detection?In a Rule-based intrusion detection system, an attack can either be detected if a rule is found in the rule base or goes undetected if not found. If this is combined with FIDS, the intrusions went undetected by RIDS can further be detected.
What is behavioural signature?In this approach, a behavioral signature is defined by predicting for each person separately, his or her outcome behavior of interest, in our case coaching behaviors, from a quantitative characterization of situations, in our case the score differential (e.g., −3 when losing by three runs, 0 when tied, +2 when leading ...
|