What justification stems from the ancient legal saying “there is no right without a remedy”?

Scheduled maintenance: Saturday, September 10 from 11PM to 12AM PDT

Home

Subjects

Solutions

Create

Log in

Sign up

Upgrade to remove ads

Only ₩37,125/year

  • Flashcards

  • Learn

  • Test

  • Match

  • Flashcards

  • Learn

  • Test

  • Match

Terms in this set (53)

· What is the part of a trial in which the government presents its evidence to prove the defendant's guilt?

case in chief

· Justification of the exclusionary rule is based on which of the following?

o constitutional rights, deterring officers from breaking laws, and preservation of judicial integrity

· According to empirical research, what type of crime is virtually unaffected by the exclusionary rule?

o both violent crime and serious property crime

· What rule is a protective procedure against violations of constitutional rights?

a prophylactic rule

· What exception allows the use of illegally obtained evidence in nontrial proceedings?

collateral use exception

· What justification stems from the ancient legal saying "There is no right without a remedy"?

constitution right

· The exclusionary rule applies to all of the following, except:

o cross-examination of the defendant.

· The good-faith exception is what type of standard?

subjective

· What case expanded the good-faith exception to include reliance personnel other than law enforcement officers?

herring vs us

· U.S. v. Moscatiello (1985) created what exception to the exclusionary rule?

independent source proceedings

· SCOTUS has ruled that the exclusionary rule does not apply:

collateral proceedings

· The 1961 case that reversed Wolf v. Colorado and made the states follow the exclusionary rule was:

mapp v ohio

· U.S. v. Leon (1984) created the:

good faith exception

· SCOTUS created the exclusionary rule in what landmark 1914 decision?

week v us

· Which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence can be introduced at trial, if the poisonous connection between the illegal police actions and the evidence weakens sufficiently?

the attention exception

· According to SCOTUS, there is an exception to the no-duty-to-protect rule called the special-relationship exception. That special relationship is:

custody

· SCOTUS has put which of the following limitations on § 1983 actions?

o They can only be brought for deliberate acts.

· Which case allowed the right to counsel for "indigents" for felonies?

gideon v wainright

· How do victims of government violations of individuals' constitutional rights sue for damages?

o By becoming plaintiffs of a civil action

· Prosecutors enjoy different types of immunity, depending on the type of action they are engaged in at the time of the misconduct. What is this type of immunity called?

o Functional immunity

· Which legal doctrine prohibits people from suing the government without its consent?

o Sovereign immunity

· Police officers and government agencies cannot be sued for failing to stop private people from inflicting injuries on others. This is known as the:

o no-affirmative-duty-to-protect rule.

· Victims of unconstitutional conduct by police officers can bring civil actions to collect damages for injuries suffered. Who can the victims sue for damages?

any or all can be sued

· The major objection to internal review of police misconduct is that:

o The police should not be policing themselves

· When the government takes people into custody against their will, the government:

o must protect them, because a special relationship has been created with the people in custody, who cannot protect themselves.

· Internal review consists of four consecutive stages: intake, investigation, deliberation, and:

disposition

· All of the following are stages of internal review, except:

arbitration

· Trials without juries, in which judges decide the facts, are called:

bench trials

· You not only have the right to counsel, but also the right to:

effective counsel

· The right to counsel attaches:

o when the government files formal charges against the defendant.

· What is the term used to describe lawyers willing to represent their clients at no charge?

counsel pro bono

· A judge can order prevention detention after deciding that the defendant either won't appear or is a threat to public safety. What level of proof is required in this situation?

o Clear and convincing evidence

· Under privately administered bail bonds, bail bondsmen or bondswomen usually charge what percentage of the amount of the bond that they turn over to the courts?

10%

· According to the moral seriousness standard, the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial extends to crimes that:

o Are morally serious and can lead to jail time

· What is the instruction that tells jurors they can infer that the witness's testimony would have been unfavorable to the prosecution?

missing witness instruction

· Hearsay violates the confrontation clause because:

o the defendant can't cross-examine the witnesses against them.

· Which court case ruled that the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines are advisory, but that they enjoy the presumption of reasonableness?

us v booker

· What is necessary for individual defendants to overturn a death sentence based on race?

o Defendants have to prove that their case was infected by racial views.

· The Sixth Amendment confrontation clause:

o guarantees the defense the right to cross-examine the government's witnesses.

· According to SCOTUS in North Carolina v. Alford, which is true regarding a plea of guilty?

o To pass constitutional muster, a guilty plea must be voluntary and intelligent.

writ of certiorari

o is a discretionary writ, which allows SCOTUS to either agree or not agree to hear and decide a case.

· Defendants have the right under the Sixth Amendment to force witnesses to come to court to testify for them. This is called:

compulsory process

· The process of picking the actual jurors by questioning the pool of potential jurors is called the:

voir dire

· Defendants who plead guilty give up all of the following rights, except:

o Right to an attorney

· Which type of criminal justice professional usually opposes plea bargaining?

police officers

· Prosecutors and defense attorneys can remove potential jurors without having a reason using the:

peremptory challenge

· According to the raise-or-waive doctrine, a defendant must make objections at trial in order to preserve those issues for appeal. What doctrine is this?

o Judicial economy

· What principle states that a punishment is cruel and unusual if its harshness is grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the offense?

proportionality

· All of the following are sentencing models except

police sentencing

What approach by SCOTUS leaves sentencing decisions to trial judges' discretionary judgement

hands off approach

· What doctrine says defendants have to raise their objections at trial, and they give up their right to appeal if they do not?

raise or waive

· What sentencing scheme gives primary sentencing authority to legislators?

determinate sentencing

· Which of the following offenders is most likely to receive the death penalty?

o Blacks who kill whites

Sets with similar terms

Criminal Procedures Final Chapter 8-12

61 terms

xxmirjanaxx

Criminal Law and Procedure Ch. 10-13

38 terms

austin_ausbury

Criminal Justice

97 terms

Jon0913

Criminal Procedure Mid-Term

39 terms

tattedupkitty

Sets found in the same folder

crim theory test 3

81 terms

Kaitlyn_Klein

Crim Theory test 4

85 terms

Kaitlyn_Klein

Intro to crim exam 1

104 terms

Kaitlyn_Klein

intro to corrections test 4

89 terms

Kaitlyn_Klein

Other sets by this creator

Gender test 3

117 terms

Kaitlyn_Klein

Social Problems test 4

170 terms

Kaitlyn_Klein

Victimology Test 3

101 terms

Kaitlyn_Klein

Victimology Test 2

79 terms

Kaitlyn_Klein

Other Quizlet sets

Visual Field Defects d/t Retinal and Optic Nerve L…

13 terms

kaitlinfossePLUS

CE 5/7/15

20 terms

amy_forden

Health unit 1 test

21 terms

avamenchu28

CST final

53 terms

Hannahmollie

Related questions

QUESTION

what happens to paul at end? to mom?

8 answers

QUESTION

The strand of gray hair at the end of the story signifies that...?

6 answers

QUESTION

A young child says, "I drawed you a picture!" The error in this sentence best illustrates which process of language development?

15 answers

QUESTION

What accounts for the often negative attitudes of settled societies toward the pastoral peoples living on their borders?

15 answers

Which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence can be introduced at trial if the officials would have found the evidence anyway?

Overview. The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

Which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence can be introduced at trial quizlet?

the exclusionary rule applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause. Which doctrine holds that illegally seized evidence can be introduced at trial if the officials would have found the evidence anyway? The Supreme Court's decision in Weeks v.