Which method did groups like maldef and the naacp use with great success to expand voting rights?

How do you want to study today?

Determine which of the following statements is best supported by this quote from a New York Times article.
The [North Carolina] congressional delegation, in a purple state in which neither party had a distinct edge, was at the time made up of 10 Republicans and three Democrats. A key goal, lawmakers said, was "to maintain the current partisan makeup of North Carolina's congressional delegation.""I think electing Republicans is better than electing Democrats," explained David Lewis, a Republican member of the General Assembly's redistricting committee. "So I drew this map to help foster what I think is better for the country."
Source: Adam Liptak, "Supreme Court Bars Challenges to Partisan Gerrymandering," New York Times, June 27, 2019

Sets with similar terms

What was the basis of the Supreme Court ruling Smith v Allwright that ended the white primary in Texas quizlet?

Terms in this set (18) What is the significance of the U.S. Supreme Court case Smith v. Allwright? The Court held that in primary elections, states could not restrict voters on account of race.

What are the consequences of the continued growth of party polarization quizlet?

What are the consequences of the continued growth of party polarization? Fewer moderates are elected to public office. Gridlock has increased in legislatures. Voter turnout has decreased.

What is the relationship between the temporary party organizations and the permanent party organizations quizlet?

The role of the permanent party organization is to recruit candidates, raise funds, register voters. Temporary party organization consists of primaries and conventions in which members of the major political parties select candidates for public office.

What was the basis of the Supreme Court ruling Smith v Allwright that ended the white primary in Texas Inquizitive?

It overturned the Texas state law that authorized parties to set their internal rules, including the use of white primaries. The court ruled that it was unconstitutional for the state to delegate its authority over elections to parties in order to allow discrimination to be practiced.