Abstract Cooperation among nations has become the focus of a wide range of studies in the past decade. The recent international relations literature about cooperation has adopted a distinct approach. It has tended to focus on the systematic level of analysis. It has also used game theory as its central tool of analysis. This review evaluates this literature, arguing that these methodological choices have contributed to both the greatest strengths and the greatest weaknesses of the literature in explaining cooperation among nations. The recent literature on international cooperation has made two general contributions. First, it has developed a concept of cooperation, which can help distinguish what behavior counts as cooperation and which has been adopted widely in the field. Second, the literature has tried to illuminate the conditions under which cooperation is likely to emerge. Using game theory to model relations as the systematic level parsimoniously, scholars have developed at least six hypotheses about the circumstances that promote cooperative behavior. The recent literature also suffers from at least two serious problems. The first problem flows from the assumptions used to generate the relatively parsimonious hypotheses. In particular, the way in which the assumption of anarchy is used causes problems. Second, and relatedly, the literature shows a remarkable neglect of domestic politics. As will be argued, this poses a serious limitation for understanding cooperation. Systemic theory simply cannot take us far enough. The international-level hypotheses depend on implicit theories about internal politics. Hypotheses about domestic influences on cooperation among states are not well developed. Although systemic theory has been touted for a variety of reasons, the biggest gains in understanding international cooperation in the future are likely to come from domestic-level theories. Show Journal Information World Politics, founded in 1948, is an internationally renowned quarterly journal of political science published in both print and online versions. Open to contributions by scholars, World Politics invites submission of research articles that make theoretical and empirical contributions to the literature, and review articles bearing on problems in international relations and comparative politics. Publisher Information One of the largest publishers in the United States, the Johns Hopkins University Press combines traditional books and journals publishing units with cutting-edge service divisions that sustain diversity and independence among nonprofit, scholarly publishers, societies, and associations. Journals The Press is home to the largest journal publication program of any U.S.-based university press. The Journals Division publishes 85 journals in the arts and humanities, technology and medicine, higher education, history, political science, and library science. The division also manages membership services for more than 50 scholarly and professional associations and societies. Books With critically acclaimed titles in history, science, higher education, consumer health, humanities, classics, and public health, the Books Division publishes 150 new books each year and maintains a backlist in excess of 3,000 titles. With warehouses on three continents, worldwide sales representation, and a robust digital publishing program, the Books Division connects Hopkins authors to scholars, experts, and educational and research institutions around the world. Project MUSE® Project MUSE is a leading provider of digital humanities and social sciences content, providing access to journal and book content from nearly 300 publishers. MUSE delivers outstanding results to the scholarly community by maximizing revenues for publishers, providing value to libraries, and enabling access for scholars worldwide. Hopkins Fulfillment Services (HFS) HFS provides print and digital distribution for a distinguished list of university presses and nonprofit institutions. HFS clients enjoy state-of-the-art warehousing, real-time access to critical business data, accounts receivable management and collection, and unparalleled customer service. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. Abstract Structural realism is the most prominent contemporary version of real-politik, the traditional paradigm in the study of world politics. However, given recent evidence that favors dyadic over systemic explanations for the outbreak of war, it is appropriate to reassess the achievements of structural realism in this, its most important area of application. A review of studies that use capability-based variables, aggregated at the level of the system, to account for war leads to the conclusion that structural realism remains viable but requires elaboration to compete effectively with alternative theories. In particular, the highest priority for structural realism is the development of a rational choice-based theory of state behavior in response to system structure. Journal Information A window on current trends and research in international studies worldwide, the Review publishes analytical essays along with reviews of new books. In its own way, each and every article will synthesize scholarship, clarify debates, provide new perspectives on research, identify new directions for the field, or provide new insight into scholarship in various parts of the world. Each and every issue will engage scholars, educators, and practitioners in the kind of assessment, dialogue, and debate that will shape the future of international studies. Led by an editorial team of political scientists, economists, sociologists, anthropologists and historians, the journal places a particular emphasis on an interdisciplinary focus for the study of international relations. JSTOR provides a digital archive of the print version of Mershon International Studies Review. Publisher Information Wiley is a global provider of content and content-enabled workflow solutions in areas of scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly research; professional development; and education. Our core businesses produce scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly journals, reference works, books, database services, and advertising; professional books, subscription products, certification and training services and online applications; and education content and services including integrated online teaching and learning resources for undergraduate and graduate students and lifelong learners. Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has been a valued source of information and understanding for more than 200 years, helping people around the world meet their needs and fulfill their aspirations. Wiley has published the works of more than 450 Nobel laureates in all categories: Literature, Economics, Physiology or Medicine, Physics, Chemistry, and Peace. Wiley has partnerships with many of the world’s leading societies and publishes over 1,500 peer-reviewed journals and 1,500+ new books annually in print and online, as well as databases, major reference works and laboratory protocols in STMS subjects. With a growing open access offering, Wiley is committed to the widest possible dissemination of and access to the content we publish and supports all sustainable models of access. Our online platform, Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) is one of the world’s most extensive multidisciplinary collections of online resources, covering life, health, social and physical sciences, and humanities. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. Which of the following assess the impact of ww1 on the international balance of power?Which of the following assesses the impact of World War I on the international balance of power? B. World War I weakened France and England while it strengthened the United States.
Which of the following was a major consequence of World War I?The First World War destroyed empires, created numerous new nation-states, encouraged independence movements in Europe's colonies, forced the United States to become a world power and led directly to Soviet communism and the rise of Hitler.
What were the lasting effects of World War I quizlet?The five consequences of World War I is that it brought ruin and destruction to Europe, European economies collapsed, Europe lost almost an entire generation of young men, nationalism surged in the colonial empires, and conflicts from the Treaty of Versailles were unresolved.
How did the United States curb dissent against World War I on the home front?How did the United States curb dissent against World War I on the home front? The Committee on Public Information produced government propaganda to support the war.
|
Which of the following assesses the impact of World war 1 on the international balance of power?
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 paraquee Inc.
