Which of the following events precipitated the constitutional convention of 1875?

journal article

MYSTICISM, REALISM, AND THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION OF 1876

The Southwestern Political and Social Science Quarterly

Vol. 9, No. 2 (September, 1928)

, pp. 166-184 (19 pages)

Published By: Wiley

https://www.jstor.org/stable/42880732

Publisher Information

Wiley is a global provider of content and content-enabled workflow solutions in areas of scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly research; professional development; and education. Our core businesses produce scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly journals, reference works, books, database services, and advertising; professional books, subscription products, certification and training services and online applications; and education content and services including integrated online teaching and learning resources for undergraduate and graduate students and lifelong learners. Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has been a valued source of information and understanding for more than 200 years, helping people around the world meet their needs and fulfill their aspirations. Wiley has published the works of more than 450 Nobel laureates in all categories: Literature, Economics, Physiology or Medicine, Physics, Chemistry, and Peace. Wiley has partnerships with many of the world’s leading societies and publishes over 1,500 peer-reviewed journals and 1,500+ new books annually in print and online, as well as databases, major reference works and laboratory protocols in STMS subjects. With a growing open access offering, Wiley is committed to the widest possible dissemination of and access to the content we publish and supports all sustainable models of access. Our online platform, Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) is one of the world’s most extensive multidisciplinary collections of online resources, covering life, health, social and physical sciences, and humanities.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
The Southwestern Political and Social Science Quarterly © 1928 Wiley
Request Permissions

This article is from the Encyclopedia of North Carolina edited by William S. Powell. Copyright © 2006 by the University of North Carolina Press. Used by permission of the publisher. For personal use and not for further distribution. Please submit permission requests for other use directly to the publisher.

Printer-friendly page

The Convention of 1875 resulted from legislation passed on 19 Mar. 1875 providing for the election of convention delegates in August. Since the adoption of the Constitution of 1868, the North Carolina Democratic Party had wanted to eliminate, or at least modify, the "radical" Reconstruction constitution, which they viewed as the product of blacks, northern carpetbaggers, and Unionist scalawags. Early returns from the August ballot did not favor the Democrats, and a Republican victory seemed likely. As election results in Robeson County appeared to be decisive, William R. Cox, chairman of the Democratic Conservative Executive Committee, telegraphed the county's returning board with the message: "As you love the state, hold Robeson." The Democrat-dominated returning board certified the Conservative delegates as elected without waiting for returns from four Republican precincts, and the Democrats won a majority of delegates by a razor-thin margin.

Soon after the election, Democratic delegate William A. Graham of Orange County died. When the convention met on 6 September, the delegation stood at 58 Democrats, 58 Republicans, and 3 independents, one of whom favored the Democrats and one of whom supported the Republicans. Control of the convention rested with Edward D. Ransom of Tyrrell County, who, according to Republican leader Albion W. Tourgée, was "a fool, who in my opinion wants to be bought up." Nominated by the Democrats, Ransom was elected convention president after numerous ballots when he cast a vote for himself.

An attempt by Robeson's Republican delegates to be seated ended in failure. A loud uproar erupted from the Republicans on 30 September, when the Conservative delegates from Robeson, Duncan Sinclair and C. A. McEachin, were permitted to vote for themselves. But for this move by the Democratic Conservatives, the convention would have been under Republican control. The narrow Democratic majority meant that all of the party's delegates had to be present for every vote to prevent the Republicans from adjourning the gathering.

Because of the questionable nature of their mandate, the Democrats were restrained from completely revising the constitution. All measures were agreed upon in party caucus before presentation to the full convention. When the convention adjourned on 11 October, it had adopted 30 amendments, which were presented to the people on a single ballot on 7 Nov. 1876 and passed by a vote of 120,159 to 106,554.

The amendments accomplished a variety of objectives, including prohibiting secret political societies, creating a Department of Agriculture, reducing the state supreme court from five to three members, abandoning the uniform court system in favor of legislative control over a system of inferior courts, denying the vote to those convicted of certain crimes, implementing a one-year residency requirement for voting, requiring "non-discriminatory" segregated public schools, prohibiting interracial marriages, giving the legislature control over county and township government, and simplifying the method of amending the state constitution. The amendment giving the General Assembly the power to modify or abolish county and township government had the most far-reaching effects, as it led to the County Government Act of 1877. This essentially undemocratic law-although it allowed the popular election of county treasurers, registers of deeds, and surveyors-provided that the legislature would appoint justices of the peace and these justices would in turn select county commissioners. The statute was heralded as a bulwark of Anglo-Saxon civilization, for it kept both blacks and white Republicans from holding office.

The convention of 1875 gave the Democrats majority control of political offices across the state that was not justified by their actual electoral numbers. For decades they were able to effectively squelch opposition. The County Government Act was not overturned until the advent of the Populist-Republican Fusion legislature of 1895. Even that reform was short-lived, for when the Democrats returned to power in 1898 they crushed the Republican Party by amending the constitution to disfranchise African Americans.

References:

William Durham Harris, "The Movement for Constitutional Change in North Carolina, 1868-1876" (M.A. thesis, UNC-Chapel Hill, 1932).

John V. Orth, The North Carolina State Constitution: A Reference Guide (1993).

Orth, The North Carolina State Constitution with History and Commentary (1995).

1 January 2006 | Faulkner, Ronnie W.

What caused the Constitutional Convention of 1875?

While the country was gripped by depression from 1873 to 1875, Texas's new Democratic governor, Richard Coke, and the legislature worked to remove Reconstruction policies, decentralize government, and regain political control in Texas by holding a Constitutional Convention in 1875 in Austin.

What led to the Constitution of 1876?

In general, the new constitution reflected the lack of faith in government the delegates had formed over the Reconstruction years. They slashed the power of officials along with their salaries and terms of office. The document was submitted to the voters and ratified the following year as the Constitution of 1876.

What was the Constitutional Convention 1870?

The Constitutional Convention of 1870 was called as a result of nearly a decade of disruption of and irregularity in the interpretation and application of the Constitution of 1834. In May and June of 1861, under the leadership of Isham G.

How did the 1875 Texas Constitution change the legislature quizlet?

How did the 1875 constitution change the legislature? It gave the legislature lower wages and less time in session to deliberate about legislation.