Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader. With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Show
Already have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Log in through your institution Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $29.00 USD. How does it work?
journal article A Within-Person Approach to Work Behavior and Performance: Concurrent and Lagged Citizenship-Counterproductivity Associations, and Dynamic Relationships with Affect and Overall Job PerformanceThe Academy of Management Journal Vol. 52, No. 5 (Oct., 2009) , pp. 1051-1066 (16 pages) Published By: Academy of Management https://www.jstor.org/stable/40390331 Read and download Log in through your school or library Alternate access options For independent researchers Read Online Read 100 articles/month free Subscribe to JPASS Unlimited reading + 10 downloads Purchase article $29.00 - Download now and later Abstract The present research examines the within-person structure of job performance, with an emphasis on the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and counterproductive work behavior (CWB). We demonstrate, via two experiencesampling studies, that OCB and CWB are affect-driven phenomena that exhibit considerable within-person variation. Furthermore, as predicted, the within-person affective forces on OCB were independent of those on CWB— and the two phenomena were themselves independent. When directed at an organization (rather than a supervisor or coworkers), both were, however, related (within-person) to each other and to overall job performance. We discuss implications for the within-person performance structure. Journal Information The Academy of Management Journal presents cutting edge research that provides readers with a forecast for new management thoughts and techniques. All articles published in the journal must make a strong empirical and/or theoretical contribution. All empirical methods including (but not limited to) qualitative, quantitative, or combination methods are represented. Articles published in the journal are clearly relevant to management theory and practice and identify both a compelling practical management issue and a strong theoretical framework for addressing it. For more than 40 years the journal has been recognized as indispensable reading for management scholars. The journal has been cited in such forums as The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Economist and The Washington Post. The journal is published six times per year with a circulation of 15,000. Publisher Information The Academy of Management (the Academy; AOM) is a leading professional association for scholars dedicated to creating and disseminating knowledge about management and organizations. The Academy's central mission is to enhance the profession of management by advancing the scholarship of management and enriching the professional development of its members. The Academy is also committed to shaping the future of management research and education. Founded in 1936, the Academy of Management is the oldest and largest scholarly management association in the world. Today, the Academy is the professional home for more than 18290 members from 103 nations. Membership in the Academy is open to all individuals who find value in belonging. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. The study of what people do, think, feel and act around organizations A group of people working interdependently toward some purpose. Organizational effectiveness
A broad concept represented by several perspectives, including the organization's fit with the external environment, internal subsystems configuration for high-performance, emphasis on organizational learning, and ability to satisfy the needs of key stakeholders. Perspective that organizations take their sustenance from the environment and, in turn, affect that environment through their output. Organizational Efficiency The ratio of inputs to outcomes in the organization's transformation process. Perspective that organizational effectiveness depends on the organizations capacity to acquire, share, use, and store
valuable knowledge. Company's stock of knowledge, including human capital, structural capital and relationship capital. High Performance Work Practices (HPWP) Perspective that
effective organizations incorporate several workplace practices that leverage the potential of human capital. The most
widely mentioned HPWP are employee involvement and job autonomy, which typically come together in the form of self-directed teams. Individuals, organizations, or other
entities who effect, or are affected by, the organization's objectives and actions. Relatively stable, evaluative beliefs that guide a
person's preferences for outcomes or courses of action in a variety of situations. Moral principles or values that determine whether actions are right or wrong and outcomes are good or bad. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Organizational activities intended to benefit society and the environment beyond the firm's immediate financial interests or legal obligations.. Goal-directed behaviors under the individuals control that support organizational objectives. Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCB) Various forms of cooperation and helpfulness to others that support the organization's social and psychological
context. Counterproductive Work Behaviors (CWB) Voluntary behaviors that have the potential to directly or indirectly harm the organization. Persons evaluation
of his or her job and work context. Economic, social, and cultural connectivity with people in other parts of the world. The observable demographic or physiological characteristics of employees, including personalities, beliefs, values, and attitudes. Differences in the physiological characteristics of employees, including
personalities, beliefs, values, and attitudes. The degree to which a person minimizes conflict between work
and nonwork demands Employees use technology to perform their jobs away from the physical workplace. The forces within a person that affect his/her direction intensity, and persistence of voluntary behavior. The natural aptitudes and learned capabilities required to successfully
complete a task. Skills, knowledge, aptitudes, and other personal characteristics that lead to superior performance. Employees have role perceptions in three ways:
Voluntary workplace behaviors Motivation, The relatively enduring pattern of thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that characterize a person, along with the psychological processes behind those characteristics. Are voluntary behaviors that have the potential to directly or indirectly harm the organization or its stakeholders?CWBs are voluntary behaviours that have the potential to directly or indirectly harm the organisation. They include abuse of others (e.g. insults and nasty comments), threats (threatening harm), work avoidance (e.g. tardiness), work sabotage (doing work incorrectly) and overt acts (theft). CWBs are not minor concerns.
What are the 4 types of behavior in organizational behavior?The four elements of organizational behavior are people, structure, technology, and the external environment. By understanding how these elements interact with one another, improvements can be made.
Which type of employee behaviors have the potential to indirectly or directly harm the organization quizlet?dysfunctional activities that are voluntary behaviors that have the potential to directly or indirectly harm the organization.
What term describes voluntary employee behaviors that can harm organization?Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) refers to employee voluntary behaviors that harm organizations (CWB-O) or people working in the organizations (CWB-P). Example behaviors of CWB include destroying company property, calling in sick when not ill, insulting another employee, and stealing something from the employer.
|