Which of the following is not a political argument for government intervention?

This is a preview. Log in to get access

Abstract

Most explanations of Korea's and Taiwan's economic growth since the early 1960s place heavy emphasis on export orientation. However, it is difficult to see how export orientation could have played a significant causal role in these countries' growth. The measured increase in the relative profitability of exports durring the 1960s is too insignificant to account for the phenomenal export boom that ensued. Moreover, exports were initially too small to have a significant effect on aggregate economic performance. A more plausible story focuses on the investment boom that took place in both countries. In the early 1960s both economies had an extremely well-educated labour force relative to their physical capital stock, rendering the latent return to capital quite high. By subsidizing and coordinating investment decisions, government policy managed to engineer a significant increase in the private return to capital. An exceptional degree of equality in income and wealth helped by rendering government intervention effective and keeping it free of rent seeking. The outward orientation of the economy was the result of the increase in demand for imported capital goods.

Journal Information

In 2005, Economic Policy celebrates 20 years at the forefront of economic policy debate. Over the two decades since its inception, Economic Policy has earned a reputation around the world for publishing the best, cutting-edge analyses of a wide range of key economic issues as they emerge. Economic Policy has published some of the most cited studies anywhere in the world - on financial crises, deregulation, unions, the Euro and other pressing international topics. Articles in Economic Policy are specifically commissioned from first-class economists and experts in the policy field all over the world. Their brief is to illuminate topical policy issues by combining the insights of modern economics with the best available evidence. The presentation is incisive and written in plain language accessible to a wide range of participants in the policy debate.

Publisher Information

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. OUP is the world's largest university press with the widest global presence. It currently publishes more than 6,000 new publications a year, has offices in around fifty countries, and employs more than 5,500 people worldwide. It has become familiar to millions through a diverse publishing program that includes scholarly works in all academic disciplines, bibles, music, school and college textbooks, business books, dictionaries and reference books, and academic journals.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Economic Policy © 1995 Centre for Economic Policy Research
Request Permissions

This is a preview. Log in to get access

Abstract

It is a fact of international business that governments intervene in the operations of foreign direct investors. These government actions create a high level of uncertainty in international planning and are very costly to the foreign investor. It appears, however, that not all firms experience the same degree of intervention. Within almost all nations, the government appears to intervene in some foreign companies more than in others. At one extreme some firms are forced out of the nation, while at the other extreme firms tend to grow and prosper. The purpose of this paper is first, to explain these different experiences of foreign firms, and then to address the question: How can foreign firms reduce the amount of intervention they experience? The conclusions are based on the intervention histories of more than 100 firms.

Journal Information

Journal of International Business Studies (JIBS) is a top-ranked peer-reviewed journal in the field of international business; its goal is to publish insightful, innovative and impactful research on international business. JIBS is multidisciplinary in scope, and interdisciplinary in content and methodology. JIBS is an official publication of the Academy of International Business. JIBS is published 9 times a year.

Publisher Information

Palgrave Macmillan is a global academic publisher, serving learning and scholarship in higher education and the professional world. We publish textbooks, journals, monographs, professional and reference works in print and online. Our programme focuses on the Humanities, the Social Sciences and Business. As part of the Macmillan Group, we represent an unbroken tradition of 150 years of independent academic publishing, continually reinventing itself for the future. Our goal is to be publisher of choice for all our stakeholders – for authors, customers, business partners, the academic communities we serve and the staff who work for us. We aim to do this by reaching the maximum readership with works of the highest quality.

Rights & Usage

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Journal of International Business Studies © 1982 Springer
Request Permissions

What are the political argument for government intervention?

Which of the following is not a political argument for government intervention quizlet?

Which of the following is a political reason for governments to intervene in markets?

What are the arguments against government intervention in an economy?