journal article Show
American Journal of Political Science Vol. 40, No. 1 (Feb., 1996) , pp. 295-309 (15 pages) Published By: Midwest Political Science Association https://doi.org/10.2307/2111703 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2111703 Read and download Log in through your school or library Alternate access options For independent researchers Read Online Read 100 articles/month free Subscribe to JPASS Unlimited reading + 10 downloads Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support . We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Abstract Using generalizability theory, we discuss the O'Brien (1990) method of aggregate-level reliability assessment. We contrast this theoretical conception of reliability with the theory of individual-level internal consistency. The methodology used is the O'Brien (1990) aggregate-level reliability technique for the R:A design, where "R" denotes that survey respondents reside or are nested within aggregate units (A). The aggregate unit in this analysis is the state. One-way analysis of variance is used to estimate reliabilities. Individual-level measures of reliability are inappropriate techniques when one is evaluating the reliability of aggregated measures of public opinion. Estimating aggregate-level reliability is methodologically simple and should be a common practice among the many researchers using aggregate-level variables created from individual-level data. Journal Information The American Journal of Political Science (AJPS), published four times each year, is one of the most widely-read political science journals in the United States. AJPS is a general journal of political science open to all members of the profession and to all areas of the discipline of political science. JSTOR provides a digital archive of the print version of American Journal of Political Science. The electronic version of American Journal of Political Science is available at http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code;=ajps. Authorized users may be able to access the full text articles at this site. Publisher Information The Midwest Political Science Association, founded in 1939, is a national organization of more than 2,800 political science professors, researchers, students, and public administrators from throughout the United States and over 50 foreign countries. The association is dedicated to the advancement of scholarly communication in all areas of political science. Each year the association sponsors a three-day conference of political scientists in Chicago for the purpose of presenting and discussing the latest research in political science. More than 2,000 individuals participate in this conference, which features 300 panels and programs on politics. The MPSA is headquartered at Indiana University. For further information, contact William D. Morgan, Executive Director, email: . Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. journal article Measuring Mass Political Attitudes: Change and UnreliabilityPolitical Methodology Vol. 4, No. 4 (1977) , pp. 383-413 (31 pages) Published By: Cambridge University Press https://www.jstor.org/stable/25791511 Read and download Log in through your school or library Alternate access options For independent researchers Read Online Read 100 articles/month free Subscribe to JPASS Unlimited reading + 10 downloads Purchase article $34.00 - Download now and later Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $34.00 USD. How does it work?
Abstract Research on mass political attitude change needs improved measurement tools to allow further theoretical progress. Advances in numerical maximum likelihood estimation procedures have made possible the development of more complex models for measurement use. Markov models of combined attitude change and response unreliability can permit detailed examination of patterns and dynamics of attitude change. Such models are proposed, estimated, and evaluated here, using data from the University of Michigan Survey Research Center's 1956-58-60 panel study. These models corroborate the summary findings of previous investigators--that much apparent attitude change is actually response unreliability. More important, the models demonstrate differences in the stability and reliability of different attitude positions, as well as differences in the direction of change among these positions. Publisher Information Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries. Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org. Rights & Usage This
item is part of a JSTOR Collection. Which of the following reasons can explain why voters give unreliable answers to survey questions quizlet?Which of the following reasons can explain why voters give unreliable answers to survey questions? People may be conflicted on the issue, flip-flopping between two different interpretations of it. People tend not to think about political issues before being asked.
What factors can affect the accuracy of poll results quizlet?Many things make a poll inaccurate; limited respondent options, lack of information, difficult measuring intensity, lack of interest in political issues.
Which statements best describe how people form opinions on specific political issues quizlet?Which statements best describe how people form opinions on specific political issues? Correct Ans: - Most people form opinions on the spot. - Most people rely on a wide range of considerations to form opinions.
What problems can be created by public opinion polls quizlet?What are shortcomings of polling? Limited respondent questions, lack of information, difficulty measuring intensity, and lack of interest in political issues.
|
Which of the following reasons can explain why voters give unreliable answers to survey questions?
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 paraquee Inc.
