This is a preview. Log in to get access Show Abstract This paper uses Gibb's categories of supportive and defensive communication climates to investigate whether substantial differences exist in the communication climate during discussions of sexuality between undergraduates (N = 194) and their parents and undergraduates and their closest friends. Results indicated that Gibb's categories can be collapsed into one factor labelled communication climate. Data indicated that the climate between parents and children is more defensive than the climate between peers during discussions of sexuality. While peers provided the most sex information, mothers outrank fathers as sex information providers. Journal Information Family Relations publishes applied articles that are original, innovative and interdisciplinary and that focus on diverse families and family issues. Audiences include family life educators in academic and community settings, researchers with an applied or evaluation focus, family practitioners who utilize prevention or therapeutic models and techniques, and family policy specialists. Examples of appropriate articles include those dealing with applied research, educational philosophies or practices, syntheses of substantive areas, program evaluations, and curriculum development and assessment. Articles should be conceived and written with the needs of practitioners in mind. Since 1951, Family Relations has covered areas of critical importance to family professionals. Its emphasis is family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy. It publishes: Empirical Studies Literature Reviews Conceptual Analyses Over 80% of our readers identify Family Relations as meeting their needs better than any other applied journal. Each issue of the quarterly journal (Jan., April, July, and Oct.) averages 120 pages. Total circulation is over 4,200. Articles are peer-reviewed. Publisher Information For over sixty-four years National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) has linked multi-disciplinary family professionals through its journals, conferences, state affiliate councils, and special interest sections. NCFR is non-profit, nonpartisan and fully member-funded. Researchers, educators, practitioners, and policymakers from all family fields and disiplines share knowledge and information about families. NCFR was founded in 1938. NCFR's Mission: The National Council on Family Relations (NCFR) provides a forum for family researchers, educators, and practitioners to share in the development and dissemination of knowledge about families and family relationships, establishes professional standards, and works to promote family well-being. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. Type your learning objectives here.
Communication ClimateDo you feel organized or confined in a clean work-space? Are you more productive when the sun is shining than when it’s gray and cloudy outside? Just as factors like weather and physical space impact the way we feel, communication climate influences our interpersonal interactions. Communication climate is the “overall feeling or emotional mood between people” (Wood, 1999). If you dread going to visit your family during the holidays because of tension between you and your sister, or you look forward to dinner with a particular set of friends because they make you laugh, you are responding to the communication climate—the overall mood that is created because of the people involved and the type of communication they bring to the interaction. Interpersonal Communication Now: “Sticks and Stones Can Break my Bones But Words Can Hurt Me Too”In a study published in the journal Science, researchers reported that the sickening feeling we get when we are socially rejected (being ignored at a party or passed over when picking teams) is real. When researchers measured brain responses to social stress they found a pattern similar to what occurs in the brain when our body experiences physical pain. Specifically, “the area affected is the anterior cingulate cortex, a part of the brain known to be involved in the emotional response to pain” (Fox). The doctor who conducted the study, Matt Lieberman, a social psychologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, said, “It makes sense for humans to be programmed this way. Social interaction is important to survival.” (Nishina, Juvonen, & Witkow, 2005) Principles of Communication ClimateConfirming and Disconfirming MessagesPositive and negative climates can be understood by looking at confirming and disconfirming messages. We experience positive climates when we receive messages that demonstrate our value and worth from those with whom we have a relationship. Conversely, we experience negative climates when we receive messages that suggest we are devalued and unimportant. Obviously, most of us like to be in positive climates because they foster emotional safety as well as personal and relational growth. However, it is likely that most of our relationships fall somewhere between the two extremes. Let’s start by looking at three types of messages:
John Gottman, a world-renowned relationship scientist identified four communication styles that have been shown to accurately predict the end of a relationship because of the negative climate they create. The below video talks about the “Four Hoursemen of the Aplocalypse.” Remember once again, we can never completely ensure that someone “hears what we want them to hear” (interprets what we intended). However, with some awareness and forethought, we can ensure there’s a better chance of it. CCMP also helps us with better awareness of how what we say and how we say it may impact another person’s relational or face needs. Our consideration of what human beings “need” will help us infer how they might react to messages emotionally, intellectually, or relationally. Doing so helps us communicate more effectively and appropriately whatever our goal may be.
References and Licensing6.1 Self-Disclosure & Communication Climate by Department of Communication, Indiana State University is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. Gerber, P. J., & Murphy, H. (2021, September 6). Frameworks for Identifying Types of Climate Messages. Central New Mexico Community College. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/@go/page/114785 What are defensive climates?In organizations with defensive climates, employees have the tendency to abstain from communicating their needs, as they become very cautious in making statements, and may have low level of motivation.
What does supportive climate mean?Defining a Supportive Climate. In order to create a positive classroom climate, a teacher. must develop an atmosphere in which there is a reduction. in perceived and anticipated threats to an individual, espe- cially to her or his feelings, ideas and actions.
What is defensive climate in communication?Defensive Climate Conceptualization
The defensive behaviors include evaluation, control, strategy, neutrality, superiority, and certainty. The supportive behaviors, in contrast, include description, problem orientation, spontaneity, empathy, equality, and provisionalism.
What is a defensive environment?Definition: Defensive environmental costs refer to the actual environmental protection costs incurred in preventing or neutralising a decrease in environmental quality, as well as the expenditures necessary to compensate for or repair the negative effects (damage) of environmental deterioration.
|