4.1 Acquiring and maintaining a repertoire of evaluation tools and techniques There are many tools to choose from for assessing student evaluation. Tools include: (but are not limited to) checklists, rating scales, rubrics, portfolios, exams and peer evaluations. An assessment tool has to be proficient as it is information for educators and learners alike in order to clearly indicate the criteria against which the learning will
be assessed. A checklist is the least complex form of scoring that examines the presence or absence of specific elements in the product of a performance. All elements are generally weighted the same and the gradations in quality are typically not recognized. Please see the following resources for information on creating checklists for your face-to-face, hybrid and online learning environment: A rating scale incorporates quality to the ‘elements’ in the process or product which can be numeric or descriptive. Unlike checklists, rating scales allow for attaching quality to ‘elements’ in the process or product. RubricsA rubric is a chart or matrix which includes indicators that describe different levels of achievement for the major components or ‘elements’ of a performance. A typical rubric contains a scale with a range of possible points for assessing work. Usually high numbers are associated with strong student performance and low numbers with poor student performance. Rubrics also use descriptors to assess student mastery and performance levels. The following list of templates will help get you started.
Additional Online Resources for RubricsPlease see the following resources for information on creating rubrics for your face-to-face, hybrid and online learning environment:
Peer & Self-AssessmentPeer & Self- Assessment helps students reflect on their learning throughout the course of an academic term or year, giving them the opportunity to measure their performance and skill level. Self- Assessment is used for reflection and documentation of the learner’s growth. The following is a list of self assessment resources that can be modified and adapted for your own use.
Additional Online Resources for Peer & Self AssessmentPlease see the following resources for information on creating peer & self assessment reflection tools for your face-to-face, hybrid and online learning environment:
Analytic RubricsAn analytic rubric resembles a grid with the criteria for a student product listed in the leftmost column and with levels of performance listed across the top row often using numbers and/or descriptive tags. The cells within the center of the rubric may be left blank or may contain descriptions of what the specified criteria look like for each level of performance. When scoring with an analytic rubric each of the criteria is scored individually. Example Analytic RubricArticulating Thoughts Through Written Communication—Final Paper
Advantages of Analytic Rubrics
Disadvantages of Analytic Rubrics
Developmental RubricsDevelopmental rubrics are a subset of analytic trait rubrics. The main distinction between developmental rubrics and other analytic trait rubrics is that the purpose of developmental rubrics is not to evaluate an end product or performance. Instead, developmental rubrics are designed to answer the question, “to what extent are students who engage in our programs/services developing this skill/ability/value/etc.?” Generally, this type of rubric would be based on a theory of development. Example Developmental RubricIntercultural Maturity
King, P.M. & Baxter Magolda, M.B. (2005). A developmental model of intercultural maturity, Journal of College Student Development, 46(2), 571-592. Advantages of Developmental Rubrics
Disadvantages of Developmental Rubrics
Holistic RubricsA holistic rubric consists of a single scale with all criteria to be included in the evaluation being considered together (e.g., clarity, organization, and mechanics). With a holistic rubric the rater assigns a single score (usually on a 1 to 4 or 1 to 6 point scale) based on an overall judgment of the student work. The rater matches an entire piece of student work to a single description on the scale. Example Holistic RubricArticulating thoughts through written communication— final paper/project.
Advantages of Holistic Rubrics
Disadvantages of Holistic Rubrics
ChecklistsChecklists are a distinct type of rubric – where there are only two performance levels possible. Checklists tend to be longer than other types of rubrics since each aspect of performance you are looking for in students’ work/performances essentially becomes its own criterion. When you are using a checklist, every decision is binary (yes/no, present/absent, pass/fail, etc.). Most rubrics can be converted rather directly into a checklist. For example, here is a rubric for grading journal entries:
Here is the same rubric converted into a checklist:
Advantages of ChecklistsChecklists are generally a simpler and faster way to grade than using a more traditional rubric since you are making discrete decisions for each individual performance criterion rather than trying to determine where students’ work fall into performance criteria that generally encompass a range of difference performance expectations. This also makes the grading clearer to students. Using checklists may result in less arbitrary (and more consistent) grading decisions. For example, most instructors are clear on what the top performances look like and what the bottom performances look like, but the middle gets fuzzier. When students understand that their grades will be based on all or nothing decisions, checklists also have the potential to raise the rigor of and students’ performances on our assignments. Disadvantages of ChecklistsCreating checklists for your assignments might be a slightly onerous process. This is both because checklists are longer than a traditional rubric and because identifying each of the discrete elements of “clearly written” or “well organized” might be difficult. You may find that cannot easily convert every performance element you are looking for into a checklist format. Performance criteria that are difficult to operationalize will also be difficult to convert into a checklist. It may also be difficult to decide on the exact level of granularity that might be appropriate for each assignment. For example, “uses good grammar” might be appropriate for most classes, but would be far too broad if you are teaching a course on grammar. Checklists also lose the middle so there is not a way to award credit to students who get most of the way toward achieving a criterion. What is a rubric or checklist used for?A rubric articulates expectations for student work by listing criteria for the work and performance level descriptions across a continuum of quality (Andrade, 2000; Arter and Chappuis, 2006).
What is checklist as a tool of assessment?A checklist is the least complex form of scoring that examines the presence or absence of specific elements in the product of a performance. All elements are generally weighted the same and the gradations in quality are typically not recognized.
What is the use of checklist in education?Checklists set out skills, attitudes, strategies, and behaviours for evaluation and offer ways to systematically organize information about a student or group of students.
What information do teachers gain by using this checklist rubric?Rubrics provide students with valuable information about the degree of which a specific learning outcome has been achieved. They provide students with concrete feedback that displays areas of strength and areas in need of improvement. Students can use this feedback as a tool to further develop their abilities.
|