What are some differences between consequentialist and Nonconsequentialist deontological theories of right and wrong?

Get help with access

Institutional access

Access to content on Oxford Academic is often provided through institutional subscriptions and purchases. If you are a member of an institution with an active account, you may be able to access content in one of the following ways:

Inhaltsverzeichnis Show

Get help with access
Institutional access
Society Members
Personal account
Viewing your signed in accounts
Signed in but can't access content
Institutional account management
Non Consequentialist Moral Theory
Non Consequentialist Ethical Theory
Comparing Utilitarian's And Non-Consequentialist Theories Of
Scheffler's Non-Consequentialist Moral Theory
Essay on Immanuel Kant’s Non- consequentialist Ethical Theory
Alienation, Consequentialism, And The Demands Of Morality
Consequentialism Vs Deontological Analysis
Non Consequentialism Research Paper
The Ethics Of The Integrity Objection
Are Sophisticated Consequentialism A Alternative Consequentialist? Essay
What is the difference between consequentialist and Nonconsequentialist theories?
What is the difference between consequentialist and deontological theory?
What are the main differences between the 3 approaches virtue deontological and consequentialist ethics?
What is the difference between consequentialist and Nonconsequentialist quizlet?

IP based access

Typically, access is provided across an institutional network to a range of IP addresses. This authentication occurs automatically, and it is not possible to sign out of an IP authenticated account.

Sign in through your institution

Choose this option to get remote access when outside your institution. Shibboleth / Open Athens technology is used to provide single sign-on between your institution’s website and Oxford Academic.

Click Sign in through your institution.
Select your institution from the list provided, which will take you to your institution's website to sign in.
When on the institution site, please use the credentials provided by your institution. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.

If your institution is not listed or you cannot sign in to your institution’s website, please contact your librarian or administrator.

Sign in with a library card

Enter your library card number to sign in. If you cannot sign in, please contact your librarian.

Society Members

Society member access to a journal is achieved in one of the following ways:

Sign in through society site

Many societies offer single sign-on between the society website and Oxford Academic. If you see ‘Sign in through society site’ in the sign in pane within a journal:

Click Sign in through society site.
When on the society site, please use the credentials provided by that society. Do not use an Oxford Academic personal account.
Following successful sign in, you will be returned to Oxford Academic.

If you do not have a society account or have forgotten your username or password, please contact your society.

Sign in using a personal account

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members. See below.

Personal account

A personal account can be used to get email alerts, save searches, purchase content, and activate subscriptions.

Some societies use Oxford Academic personal accounts to provide access to their members.

Viewing your signed in accounts

Click the account icon in the top right to:

View your signed in personal account and access account management features.
View the institutional accounts that are providing access.

Signed in but can't access content

Oxford Academic is home to a wide variety of products. The institutional subscription may not cover the content that you are trying to access. If you believe you should have access to that content, please contact your librarian.

Institutional account management

For librarians and administrators, your personal account also provides access to institutional account management. Here you will find options to view and activate subscriptions, manage institutional settings and access options, access usage statistics, and more.

Non Consequentialist Moral Theory
Consequentialist moral theory is a branch of ethics which is centered around morality being the result of an outcome of a certain action. The consequence of an action is the premise which defines what is moral and what is immoral. The morality is found in two areas of goods, instrumental goods and intrinsic goods. Instrumental goods are goods that allow us to acquire other goods. Intrinsic goods are goods that have some form of worth in which we desire, but may not lead us to receiving or obtaining
- 812 Words
- 4 Pages
Non Consequentialist Ethical Theory
On the other hand, some philosophies do not agree with the consequentialist theory so they developed a theory called non-consequentialist ethical theory as known as duty-based theory and deontologists. Deontologists is more concern on duty, rule, obligation, not on the result of action but on its principle. Whether an action is right or wrong is based on duty and the rules help human begin to distinguish right and wrong, phases: “one man action is another man right”. Deontologists is looked into
- 675 Words
- 3 Pages
Comparing Utilitarian's And Non-Consequentialist Theories Of

Non-consequentialist theories of morality are based on something other than the consequences of a person’s actions. (Thiroux, 2012). A non-consequentialist theory of value judges the rightness or wrongness of an action based on properties intrinsic to the action, not on its consequences. Consequences do not, and in fact should not, enter into judging whether actions or people are moral or immoral. (Thiroux, 2012). Actions are to be judged solely on whether they are right and people solely on whether
- 481 Words
- 2 Pages
Scheffler's Non-Consequentialist Moral Theory
negative responsibility. He argues that from a consequentialist perspective, an agent is equally responsible for the actions they allow or simply do not prevent as they are for the actions they take themselves. All varieties of ‘causal connections’ between an action (or inaction) and a produced state of affairs are equal in importance. Thus, if one
- 1343 Words
- 6 Pages
Essay on Immanuel Kant’s Non- consequentialist Ethical Theory
consideration and not be based upon the effects of what such actions may produce such as the case in the consequentialist theory of cause. In this essay Kant’s ethical non-consequentialist theory will be briefly investigated and a comparison drawn between the two different theories in order to establish merit in employment thereof in practice. 2. Kantian Morality Central to Kant’s morality theory is his claim that: “It is impossible to conceive anything at all in the world, or even out of it, which
- 1369 Words
- 6 Pages
- 5 Works Cited
Alienation, Consequentialism, And The Demands Of Morality
how the impartial and universal morality conflicts with the non-universal personal sentiments and goals (e.g. love), Railton in “Alienation, Consequentialism and the Demands of Morality” introduces the concept of sophisticated consequentialism to refute the claim of consequentialism as the most incompatible form of moral theory. Railton contends that, sophisticated consequentialism, in fact, effectively characterizes how non-consequentialist motivation paired with objective morality diminishes alienation
- 1761 Words
- 8 Pages
Consequentialism Vs Deontological Analysis

To analyze the dilemma one must understand how a consequentialist and a deontological would come to their conclusions. A basic difference is the consequentialist would believe the end justifies the means. A deontologist would conclude that irrespective of outcomes, the method or means should conform to a stricture or rule set. The consequentialist is focused on the consequences of the action. If the end result provides more good than bad, they would conclude the action justifies the end result
- 512 Words
- 3 Pages
Non Consequentialism Research Paper

Consequentialist and non- consequentialist Consequentialist : Consequentialist or teleological consideration is about result of an action, which can affect an act by an individual or a group. ( T&K, p.30). There are two types of major consequentialist ethical theories are ethical egoism and Utilitarianism. Universal E/E: everyone should act in their own self interest, the consequences of an action will affect all the parties involved. Universal egoist refers for all of us or for all human being
- 1681 Words
- 7 Pages
The Ethics Of The Integrity Objection
Objection is a counter-argument to consequentialism first proposed by Bernard Williams in 1973. It problematizes consequentialist moral philosophy on the grounds that it forces an agent to forfeit their ‘integrity’ – their character and personal values – in order to follow an impartial moral calculus. When an agent performs an action which is morally correct according to a consequentialist calculation, they may experience guilt, sadness, or other negative emotions despite the moral rightness of what
- 1336 Words
- 6 Pages
Are Sophisticated Consequentialism A Alternative Consequentialist? Essay

As per its author of Alienation, Consequentialism, and Society, Railton’s opinion of what a sophisticated consequentialist is: “as someone who has a standing commitment to leading an objectively consequentialist life, but who need not set special stock in any particular form of decision making and therefore does not necessarily seek to lead a subjectively consequentialist life.” Sophisticated consequentialism is a hybrid, as it adopts the ideological tenants of both modalities of consequentialism
- 931 Words
- 4 Pages

What is the difference between consequentialist and Nonconsequentialist theories?

While consequentialist accounts focus only on how much good or bad an action produces, non-consequentialist ethics often take other factors into account beyond consequences. For example, the consequentialist view generally holds that people should only weigh their own welfare as much as that of any other person.

What is the difference between consequentialist and deontological theory?

The main difference between deontology and consequentialism is that deontology focuses on the rightness or wrongness of actions themselves, whereas consequentialism focuses on the consequences of the action.

What are the main differences between the 3 approaches virtue deontological and consequentialist ethics?

Virtue ethics is currently one of three major approaches in normative ethics. It may, initially, be identified as the one that emphasizes the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to the approach that emphasizes duties or rules (deontology) or that emphasizes the consequences of actions (consequentialism).