What are the main similarities and differences between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution?

Nội dung chính Show

• Shortest Constitution
• Articles of Confederation Vs. the US Constitution
• Legislature
• Voting in Congress
• Executive Branch
• Drafting Laws
• Armed Forces
• Trade and Commerce
• Articles of Confederation vs Constitution

If you sit to compare the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, you will realize that even though they were drafted by the same people and that too within a span of just over a decade, there exist quite a few differences in them.

Shortest Constitution

With 4,400 words, the US Constitution is the shortest written constitution in the world. In contrast, the Constitution of India, which is the longest, has 117,369 words.

The Articles of Confederation, which was considered the first constitution of the United States of America, and the US Constitution, which acts as the supreme law in the United States today, both are poles apart. In fact, it was only because of the weaknesses of the Articles that the present-day US Constitution was drafted.

Backdrop

The Articles of Confederation or Articles was a written agreement which laid the guidelines for the functioning of the national government. It was drafted by the Continental Congress and sent to the thirteen original states for ratification in November 1777. The ratification process was important, as without it the document did not come into effect. On February 2, 1781, Maryland became the last state to ratify it, following which it was ratified by the Congress on March 1, 1781.

Within a few years of its ratification, the Articles was subjected to severe criticism by the Founding Fathers of the United States. Problems with the document existed in plenty; the biggest issue being the fact that it left the national government at the mercy of states. Eventually, it was decided that this agreement had to be revised to suit the needs of the nation as a whole. In May 1787, delegates from the thirteen states met in Philadelphia to revise the same.

The impressive list of delegates at the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 featured prominent names of the American history, such as James Madison, George Washington, William Pierce, and Benjamin Franklin. During the convention, these delegates came to the conclusion that it was better to draft an entirely new constitution instead of revising the existing agreement, and thus came into existence the new US Constitution.

Articles of Confederation Vs. the US Constitution

The Articles was subjected to severe criticism as it centralized all the powers in the hands of state governments and left the national government at their mercy. That, however, was not the only point of distinction between these documents. The two differed in several contexts, including the number of votes in the Congress and the need of judiciary.

Legislature

While the Articles of Confederation had a unicameral system of governance in place in the form of the Congress, the US Constitution introduced the bicameral system, dividing the United States Congress into the Senate (upper house) and the House of Representatives (lower house).

Voting in Congress

The Articles had a provision of one vote for every single state irrespective of its size. In contrast, the US Constitution introduced the system wherein every representative or senator was given one vote.

Executive Branch

The new Constitution also made provision for establishing the executive branch of the government, something which the Articles of Confederation didn’t facilitate. Thereby, the executive, i.e., the President, was chosen by an electoral college.

Judiciary

When the Articles was the law of the land, federal courts were not in picture and all laws were enforced by state courts. The Constitution changed this by putting a federal court system in place, which was assigned the task of resolving disputes between the citizens as well as the states. So, the disputes between states were resolved by the Supreme Court instead of the Congress, which was given similar power by the Articles of Confederation.

Drafting Laws

When the Articles was the supreme law, the national government needed approval from nine of the thirteen states to pass new laws. This changed with the ratification of the new Constitution, wherein approval of more than half of the total nominees of the states was enough to pass new laws.

Amendments

In order to amend the Articles, the national government needed unanimous approval from all the thirteen states. In the case of the US Constitution, an amendment requires the approval of ⅔ of both the houses and ¾ of state legislatures. Of the 27 amendments to the US Constitution, the first 10 amendments―collectively known as the Bill of Rights―were adopted to pacify the Anti-Federalists who had some reservations about the new Constitution.

Armed Forces

The Articles of Confederation allowed states to have their own army. However, the national government was dependent on states if it was to raise an army. In contrast, the Constitution gave the federal government the right to raise an army to deal with conflict situations.

Trade and Commerce

While the Articles didn’t allow any interference on the part of the national government in trade and commerce, the US Constitution gave the federal government the right to regulate the same at the international as well as the inter-state level, i.e., between the states.

Taxes

One of the biggest problems with the Articles of Confederation was that it did not allow the national government to levy taxes on citizens, thus putting it at the mercy of states. The Constitution rectified the loophole, allowing both, the federal government and state governments to levy and collect taxes.

Canada

The Articles of Confederation also gave Canada, which was then under the British, the opportunity to join the Union as a fully sovereign state by declaring its independence and agreeing to the terms of the Articles. The Constitution, however, didn’t pursue the neighbor. Interestingly, the invitation to Canada was open until the ratification of the new Constitution.

The US Constitution was drafted as the Articles of Confederation, which preceded it, didn’t live up to the expectations. While the states were happy with the Articles, as it put them in command with the national government having no enforcing authority whatsoever, it resulted in chaos, with each state coming up with its own laws. A strong push was required to bring the state of the affairs back on the track and that came with the US Constitution, which has definitely lived up to the expectations.

Articles of Confederation vs. U.S. Constitution The Articles of the Confederation and the U.S. Constitution are two articles that where written and accepted by the United States as a foundation for their new government. They are both very important documents that have similarities and differences.

Some of the main things the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution have in common is that they addressed the needs of its constituencies. Both of these Documents were created with the mind set to provide the foundation for a unified, centralized government. Even though the confederation only lasted from 1781-1789, it was still seen to be valuable with its belief that sovereignty belongs to every state. After the Confederation ended in 1789, the U.S. Constitution took place bringing the states together as a whole. While these two documents have the needs of the nation in mind, they both do have quite a bit of a difference as well.

Articles of Confederation and Constitution are two known documents that note the changes that American Revolution made. The regulations of the Articles of Confederation were accepted and signed by the 13 states of the United States of America. 

The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union was the agreement that the 13 states of the United States agreed to follow. This was considered as their earliest constitution.

The constitution in India is the longest one containing 444 articles, making it the largest democracy. Constitutions can also be implemented by individual institutions to prescribe the rules for them.

Articles of Confederation vs Constitution

The main difference between the Articles of Confederation and Constitution is that the Articles of Confederation are the rules that were agreed by the United States of America in the 18th century whereas the constitution is the rules that democratic countries and other legalized institutions develop to implement law and order in their body.

The Articles of Confederation and the Perpetual Union was a bond that was signed between 13 states in the United States of America. It consisted of the rules that were to be followed by these states in the 18th century.

The Articles of Confederation was a written document that embellished the idea of introducing a friendly bond between the states.  This process was a long one.

The committee included 13 people to finalize the draft. John Dickinson was the head of the committee and he presented the final draft of Articles of Confederation on 12th July 1776.

Virginia ratified the Articles of Confederation and was followed by the others in the early 1779’s. But these articles gave minimum power to the central government and hence there it was headed by an unstructured central government.

The Constitution of a country is the collection of all the rules and regulations that a citizen has to obey in the country. This is made by a group of people who are trusted by the government because of their social knowledge.

This is a written document where the principles are written by considering the behavior of the entity. If the constitution is written in a single comprehensive unit, then it is known as a codified constitution.

Anybody who intends for a systematic and organized working structure can create a constitution that they need. A constitution is the backbone of a democratic country and hence the power is divided among different departments.

The constitution considers the central government as the epitome of powers. The central government can decide or nullify the laws that the state government implied.

1. The individual citizens were not allowed to claim the Bill of Rights according to the Articles of Confederation. Anyone can claim their rights according to the constitution.
2. If 9 out of 13 states accepted a law, then it was brought to act by the Articles of Confederation. The constitution demands that both the houses have to pass the law for enforcing it on the public.

The Articles of Confederation was an early representation of a government drafted by the United States of America. This was drafted to divide the powers among the states. It came into action by the late 18th century.

The constitution is the latest document that is prepared by the officials to decide the way their government has to operate. Constitution is the document that leads to a democratic government.

References

Search for "Ask Any Difference" on Google. Rate this post!

What were the main differences between the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation?

What are the similarities and differences between the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation?

What are the similarities between the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation?