journal article Show
Comparative Studies in Society and History Vol. 51, No. 4 (Oct., 2009) , pp. 927-940 (14 pages) Published By: Cambridge University Press https://www.jstor.org/stable/40270367 Read and download Log in through your school or library Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log in Monthly Plan
Yearly Plan
Purchase a PDFPurchase this article for $34.00 USD. How does it work?
Journal Information Comparative Studies in Society and History (CSSH) is an international forum for new research and interpretation concerning problems of recurrent patterning and change in human societies through time and the contemporary world. CSSH sets up a working alliance among specialists in all branches of the social sciences and humanities as a way of bringing together multidisciplinary research, cultural studies, and theory, especially in anthropology, history, political science, and sociology. Review articles and discussion bring readers in touch with current findings and issues. Instructions for Contributors at Cambridge Journals Online Publisher Information Cambridge University Press (www.cambridge.org) is the publishing division of the University of Cambridge, one of the world’s leading research institutions and winner of 81 Nobel Prizes. Cambridge University Press is committed by its charter to disseminate knowledge as widely as possible across the globe. It publishes over 2,500 books a year for distribution in more than 200 countries. Cambridge Journals publishes over 250 peer-reviewed academic journals across a wide range of subject areas, in print and online. Many of these journals are the leading academic publications in their fields and together they form one of the most valuable and comprehensive bodies of research available today. For more information, visit http://journals.cambridge.org. Which of the following claims that Barkey makes in the passage appears to contradict most directly her assertion in the first sentence of the first paragraph?Which of the following claims that Barkey makes in the passage appears to contradict most directly her assertion in the first sentence of the first paragraph? Non-Muslims were second-class citizens who endured prejudice.
Which of the following is true of both the Ottoman Empire and the Mughal Empire between 1450 and 1750?Which of the following is true of both the Ottoman Empire and the Mughal Empire between 1450 and 1750 ? The rulers of both believed in strictly separating secular and religious concerns.
Which of the following was the most direct outcome of the conflict between Great Britain and the Ottoman Empire referred to in the passage?Which of the following was the most direct outcome of the conflict between Great Britain and the Ottoman Empire referred to in the passage? The Ottoman Empire collapsed.
Which of the following was the most important long term effect of the European acquisition?one of the long term effects was that european control forcibly integrated largely agrarian african societies into the modern world industrial economy.
|
Which would most strongly support Barkeys claim regarding the Ottoman state and toleration in the passage?
zusammenhängende Posts
Urheberrechte © © 2024 paraquee Inc.
