Unethical behavior erodes trust, and also negatively affects cooperation in organizations.

Introduction

At a time of strict competition and continuously evolving customer demands, hotel managers now realize that customer-contact employees (CCEs) are among the most important actors in the effective implementation of organizational responses to customer complaints, achievement of positive customer service experiences, and enhancement of customer retention rates (e.g., Dimitriou and Schwepker, 2019; Wang et al., 2021). However, if CCEs have unfavorable perceptions of leadership practices, they may display ineffective task performance and poor service recovery (Dimitriou and Schwepker, 2019, Ozturk et al., 2021). Employees may consider leaders’ destructive behaviors (e.g., intimidation and humiliation) as shocks and exhibit nonattendance behavior to minimize direct contact with the supervisor/manager. As a result, this activates their propensity to leave the company (cf. Albashiti et al., 2021).

Ethical leadership (ETL), which refers to“…the demonstration of normatively appropriate conduct through personal actions and interpersonal relationships, and the promotion of such conduct to followers through two-way communication, reinforcement, and decision-making” (Brown et al., 2005, p. 120), is one of the major leadership styles that boosts positive attitudes and behaviors (Kim and Brymer, 2011, Qin et al., 2014, Walumbwa et al., 2011, Wang and Xu, 2021). Such a leadership style is important in an organization where customer satisfaction and loyalty are accomplished via successful complaint-handling and service delivery processes.

Employees who perceive that ETL is implemented effectively in the workplace develop trust in organization (TiO) (Xu et al., 2016). Trust denotes “…a psychological state comprising the intention to accept vulnerability based upon positive expectations of the intentions or behavior of another” (Rousseau et al., 1998, p. 395). TiO, which fosters employees’ attitudinal and behavioral outcomes (Aryee et al., 2002), can be considered one of the immediate consequences of ETL (cf. Xu et al., 2016), as is the case with servant leadership (Ilkhanizadeh and Karatepe, 2018). If TiO is one of the proximal outcomes to ETL, then employees are expected to exhibit positive affective and performance consequences.

Against this background, the current study develops a research model where TiO mediates the impact of ETL on absenteeism, social loafing behavior, and service recovery performance (SRP). That is, our paper assesses (a) the impact of ETL on TiO, absenteeism, social loafing behavior, and SRP; (b) the effect of TiO on absenteeism, social loafing behavior, and SRP; and (c) TiO as a mediator in the aforementioned linkages.

SRP, which denotes “…frontline service employees’ perceptions of their own abilities and actions to resolve a service failure to the satisfaction of the customer” (Babakus et al., 2003, p. 274), is considered one of the performance outcomes of ETL and TiO. This is important because SRP is an important tool to convert aggrieved customers into a state of satisfaction and a valuable source of positive word-of-mouth communication (Babakus et al., 2003). Absenteeism is one of the nonattendance behaviors eroding service workers’ morale and hindering effective service delivery (Chang et al., 2020, Ozturk and Karatepe, 2019). Social loafing behavior, which is defined as “… the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually” (Karau and Williams, 1993, p. 681), is a non-role performance outcome. Employees are more inclined to exhibit social loafing behavior as a result of their dissatisfaction with managerial practices in the organization (Luo et al., 2013).

The present study seeks to address at least three gaps by developing and empirically testing a research model of ETL and employee reactions. First, hospitality managerial or non-managerial employees often exhibit unethical behaviors (Teng et al., 2020). Giving unfair treatment to customers, overcharging customers, providing misleading information, engaging in food fraud, and showing service sabotage are among these behaviors (Dimitriou and Schwepker, 2019, Schwepker and Dimitriou, 2021, Yan et al., 2021). ETL which enables leaders to create an environment where employees are expected to display appropriate behavior can be a remedy to the prevention of said behaviors. In such an environment, leaders do not only emphasize more directive and normative behavior but also cares for their followers, shows integrity, and serves the good of the whole (Van Dierendonck, 2011). It has been reported that ETL mitigates hotel employees’ ethical ambiguity (Schwepker and Dimitriou, 2021). Though ETL has been linked to several behavioral consequences such as organizational citizenship behavior, counterproductive work behavior, and task performance, Ng and Feldman’s (2015) and Bedi et al. (2016) meta-analytic studies as well as empirical investigations in the extant literature do not delineate any evidence regarding the association between ETL and three critical employee outcomes such as absenteeism, social loafing behavior, and SRP.

The abovementioned gap is apparent in the current hospitality and tourism research, which delineates empirical studies about ETL (e.g., Dimitriou and Schwepker, 2019; Garba et al., 2018; Wang and Xu, 2021). Such void has also been denoted in Myung’s (2018) review. Lack of evidence regarding the impact of ETL on employees’ performance and non-role performance outcomes and absenteeism is surprising because the customer service experience is highly influenced by the ethical values and CCEs’ behaviors (Dimitriou and Schwepker, 2019, Yesiltas and Tuna, 2018). With this realization, the current paper tests absenteeism, social loafing behavior, and SRP as the three critical outcomes of ETL (e.g., Dai et al., 2020; Hewagama et al., 2019; Liden et al., 2004). In a workplace where hotel managers have begun to pay particular attention to employees’ ethical behaviors and beliefs (Teng and Cheng, 2021), testing the abovementioned relationships is relevant and significant.

Second, recent studies investigated the mediating role of trust in leader (TIL) in the association between ETL and behavioral consequences (e.g., Javed et al., 2018; Mo and Shi, 2017; Mary and Ozturen, 2019). To the best of authors’ knowledge, there is only one empirical paper that has examined the direct effect of ETL on TiO so far. Specifically, Xu et al. (2016) disclosed that TiO partly mediated the influence of ETL on procedural and distributive justice. As argued by Xu et al. (2016), ethical leaders’ actions should provide a base for fostering TiO if they are the unique moral agents of the company. In addition, Wood et al. (2021) indicated that corporate social responsibility completely mediated the association between ETL and organizational trust. Considering the abovementioned dearth of evidence, this paper uses TiO as the mediating construct relating ETL to absenteeism, social loafing behavior, and SRP.

Third, the relevant literature delineates a number of leaderships styles such as servant, authentic, transformational, empathetic and engaging leadership (Gui et al., 2020, Kaya and Karatepe, 2020, Kock et al., 2019, Schaufeli, 2021). Servant and authentic leadership are among the promising leadership styles (Brownell, 2010, Kaya and Karatepe, 2020). However, we focus on ETL and its consequences in a country, which has been suffering from unethical practices for years. Specifically, it is well-documented that the global hospitality industry is beset with a number of unethical practices such as service sabotage, sexual harassment, and over charging (Dimitriou and Schwepker, 2019, Teng et al., 2020). As a developing sub-Saharan African country, Nigeria is plagued with a number of problems such as corruption and political instability (Karatepe and Magaji, 2008). This is also evident in the corruption perception index (Transparency International, 2021). As Marquette (2012) states, “…regardless of religion, people who live in highly corrupt countries tend to condemn corruption. However, they also may feel that their own corrupt behavior is justified given the systemic nature of the corruption.” (p. 15). Accordingly, it is of great importance to ascertaining the potential outcomes of ETL in a global hospitality market environment where there are unethical practices, and in a country (i.e., Nigeria) where corruption is one of the major problems facing the society. By doing so, the findings of our paper would provide a number of implications how ETL can be injected in the company and TiO can be established. In short, our paper enhances current knowledge by assessing the previously mentioned linkages via data collected from hotel CCEs in Nigeria.

Section snippets

Research model

Ethical behavior is a crucial component in different leadership styles (servant, authentic and transformational leadership) (Yang and Wei, 2018). In a company where ETL is practiced effectively, there is a concern for people and a fair treatment of employees (Brown et al., 2005). Leaders known for their ethical behaviors and practices are trustworthy and honest (Brown and Treviňo, 2006). This fosters TIL and organizational trust (Kalshoven and Den Hartog, 2009, Xu et al., 2016). Employees and

Sample and data collection

Data for this study were solicited from CCEs such as concierges, bartenders, bell attendants, front desk agents, receptionists, and guest relations representatives who were in close contact with customers. They were full-time employees in the four- and five-star hotels in Lagos, Nigeria. Lagos is the fourth most populous city in the world and tourism is a major source of revenue for the city (Fattah and Fasinro, 2017). At the time of this study, the Lagos State Ministry of Arts and Culture

Measurement model testing

Covariance matrix was tapped in LISREL 8.30 (Joreskog and Sorbom, 1996). The initial findings from confirmatory factory analysis led to deletion of two items from the ETL and TiO measures due to their standardized loadings (λ) < than 0.50 and measurement error. After this deletion, model fit statistics denoted that the five-factor measurement model presented a good explanation of the observed covariance among the variables (Table 2): χ2 = 576.11, df = 367; χ2 / df = 1.57; Standardized root mean

General findings

In this paper, we have proposed a model that strives for a better understanding of ETL in the hospitality industry. Specifically, our paper has examined the consequences of ETL among hotel CCEs and TiO as a mediator of the impact of ETL on absenteeism, social loafing behavior, and SRP. As expected, ETL fosters CCEs’ TiO. When employees perceive that ETL is implemented effectively in the workplace, they possess elevated levels of organizational trust. This is concordant with social exchange

Acknowledgment

Data used in this study came from part of a larger project. Financial support was granted to our research from the Eastern Mediterranean University Scientific Research Budget-Type C (BAP-C 0B-18-01).

© 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Which cause of unethical behavior makes the individual overlook the behavior of another when it is in our best interest?

Table 1.2 states that "motivated blindness" occurs when we overlook the unethical behavior of another when it's in our interest to remain ignorant.

Which of the following is Step 1 in the three steps of the applied approach to problem solving?

Step 1: Identify and define the problem.

What kind of response is a manager completing when he or she eliminates the situation in which the problem occurs?

Terms in this set (10) What kind of a response is a manager completing when he or she eliminates the situation in which the problem occurs? Dissolving problems requires changing or eliminating the situation in which the problem occurs.

What perspective states that behavior is a function of interdependent person and situation factors?

the interactional perspective states that behavior is a function of interdependent person and environmental factors. Situations and people are both dynamic—they change.